GCCIX vs. MCSFX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

GCCIX (Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund) and MCSFX (MFS Commodity Strategy Fund) are both Commodities funds. Over the past 5 years, GCCIX returned 10.28%/yr vs 10.39%/yr for MCSFX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GCCIX charges 0.59%/yr vs 1.89%/yr for MCSFX.

Performance

GCCIX vs. MCSFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund (GCCIX) and MFS Commodity Strategy Fund (MCSFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GCCIX achieves a 18.82% return, which is significantly lower than MCSFX's 23.89% return.

GCCIX

• 1D: 0.82%
• 1M: -0.61%
• YTD: 18.82%
• 6M: 19.60%
• 1Y: 29.86%
• 3Y*: 14.47%
• 5Y*: 10.28%
• 10Y*: 5.07%

MCSFX

• 1D: 0.90%
• 1M: -1.11%
• YTD: 23.89%
• 6M: 24.64%
• 1Y: 38.04%
• 3Y*: 15.99%
• 5Y*: 10.39%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GCCIX vs. MCSFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
GCCIX Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund	18.82%	15.45%	5.92%	-9.65%	15.70%	33.42%	-23.01%	0.38%
MCSFX MFS Commodity Strategy Fund	23.89%	17.09%	4.32%	-7.25%	12.27%	26.40%	-1.34%	-1.69%

Correlation

The correlation between GCCIX and MCSFX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2019	0.89

The correlation between GCCIX and MCSFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GCCIX vs. MCSFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GCCIX

GCCIX Risk / Return Rank: 61
GCCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
GCCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
GCCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
GCCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
GCCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 56

MCSFX

MCSFX Risk / Return Rank: 77
MCSFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
MCSFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
MCSFX Omega Ratio Rank: 69
MCSFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
MCSFX Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GCCIX vs. MCSFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund (GCCIX) and MFS Commodity Strategy Fund (MCSFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GCCIX	MCSFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.29	2.60	-0.31
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.91	3.26	-0.35
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.47	-0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.17	4.87	-0.70
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	11.31	15.48	-4.17
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GCCIX vs. MCSFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GCCIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is comparable to the MCSFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GCCIX and MCSFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GCCIX	MCSFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.29	2.60	-0.31
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.56	0.31	+0.25
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.25	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.15	0.33	-0.48

Drawdowns

GCCIX vs. MCSFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GCCIX drawdown since its inception was -90.80%, which is greater than MCSFX's maximum drawdown of -37.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCCIX and MCSFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GCCIX	MCSFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-90.80%	-37.16%	-53.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.48%	-8.19%	+0.71%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.89%	-9.60%	-2.29%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.78%	-37.16%	+8.38%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-57.76%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-70.56%	-3.46%	-67.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-69.43%	-18.29%	-51.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.76%	2.58%	+0.18%

Volatility

GCCIX vs. MCSFX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund (GCCIX) has a higher volatility of 4.95% compared to MFS Commodity Strategy Fund (MCSFX) at 4.71%. This indicates that GCCIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MCSFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GCCIX	MCSFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.95%	4.71%	+0.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.20%	13.75%	-1.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.40%	15.90%	-1.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.48%	34.15%	-15.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.02%	29.58%	-9.56%

GCCIX vs. MCSFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GCCIX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than MCSFX's 1.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

GCCIX vs. MCSFX - Dividend Comparison

GCCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.54%, more than MCSFX's 12.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GCCIX Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund	13.54%	16.09%	4.08%	4.20%	10.41%	16.46%	0.36%	10.81%	1.47%	5.88%	0.84%	0.36%
MCSFX MFS Commodity Strategy Fund	12.14%	15.05%	2.25%	1.04%	26.24%	54.80%	0.15%	0.86%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GCCIX and MCSFX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, GCCIX and MCSFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, GCCIX or MCSFX?

GCCIX has higher volatility (4.95%) compared to MCSFX (4.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GCCIX dropped -90.80% vs MCSFX's -37.16%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MCSFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.