MCSFX vs. BCSKX
Compare and contrast key facts about MFS Commodity Strategy Fund (MCSFX) and BlackRock Commodity Strategies Fund Class K (BCSKX).
MCSFX is managed by MFS. It was launched on Aug 15, 2018. BCSKX is a passively managed fund by BlackRock that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return. It was launched on Oct 3, 2011.
Performance
MCSFX vs. BCSKX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MCSFX vs. BCSKX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCSFX MFS Commodity Strategy Fund | 20.28% | 17.09% | 4.32% | -7.25% | 12.27% | 26.40% | -1.34% | -1.69% |
BCSKX BlackRock Commodity Strategies Fund Class K | 19.21% | 28.88% | 4.44% | -4.27% | 11.95% | 22.49% | 6.84% | 1.77% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MCSFX achieves a 20.28% return, which is significantly higher than BCSKX's 19.21% return.
MCSFX
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 6.91%
- YTD
- 20.28%
- 6M
- 26.86%
- 1Y
- 29.49%
- 3Y*
- 12.79%
- 5Y*
- 12.72%
- 10Y*
- —
BCSKX
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 0.65%
- YTD
- 19.21%
- 6M
- 26.57%
- 1Y
- 40.92%
- 3Y*
- 16.13%
- 5Y*
- 14.29%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MCSFX vs. BCSKX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MCSFX has a 1.89% expense ratio, which is higher than BCSKX's 0.67% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MCSFX vs. BCSKX — Risk / Return Rank
MCSFX
BCSKX
MCSFX vs. BCSKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Commodity Strategy Fund (MCSFX) and BlackRock Commodity Strategies Fund Class K (BCSKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MCSFX | BCSKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.84 | 2.58 | -0.74 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.35 | 3.25 | -0.90 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.47 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.19 | 3.89 | -0.70 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.29 | 19.70 | -10.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MCSFX | BCSKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.84 | 2.58 | -0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | 0.91 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.75 | -0.43 |
Correlation
The correlation between MCSFX and BCSKX is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MCSFX vs. BCSKX - Dividend Comparison
MCSFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.51%, more than BCSKX's 2.63% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCSFX MFS Commodity Strategy Fund | 12.51% | 15.05% | 2.25% | 1.04% | 26.24% | 54.80% | 0.15% | 0.86% | 0.00% |
BCSKX BlackRock Commodity Strategies Fund Class K | 2.63% | 3.13% | 3.66% | 9.45% | 9.11% | 2.72% | 0.84% | 2.08% | 2.02% |
Drawdowns
MCSFX vs. BCSKX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MCSFX drawdown since its inception was -37.16%, which is greater than BCSKX's maximum drawdown of -30.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCSFX and BCSKX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MCSFX | BCSKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.16% | -30.34% | -6.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.56% | -10.51% | +0.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.16% | -22.34% | -14.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.59% | -1.36% | -0.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.70% | -6.67% | -12.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.28% | 2.08% | +1.20% |
Volatility
MCSFX vs. BCSKX - Volatility Comparison
MFS Commodity Strategy Fund (MCSFX) has a higher volatility of 6.45% compared to BlackRock Commodity Strategies Fund Class K (BCSKX) at 4.44%. This indicates that MCSFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BCSKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MCSFX | BCSKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.45% | 4.44% | +2.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.51% | 12.33% | +1.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.69% | 16.16% | +0.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.14% | 15.80% | +18.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.85% | 15.08% | +14.77% |