GCCIX vs. GCGIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund (GCCIX) and Goldman Sachs Large Cap Growth Insights Fund (GCGIX).
GCCIX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Mar 29, 2007. GCGIX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on May 1, 1997.
Performance
GCCIX vs. GCGIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GCCIX vs. GCGIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCCIX Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund | 14.11% | 15.45% | 5.92% | -9.65% | 15.70% | 33.42% | -23.01% | 16.75% | -14.89% | 4.31% |
GCGIX Goldman Sachs Large Cap Growth Insights Fund | -11.07% | 15.51% | 53.44% | 37.56% | -29.62% | 29.10% | 32.21% | 29.70% | -4.58% | 29.75% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GCCIX achieves a 14.11% return, which is significantly higher than GCGIX's -11.07% return. Over the past 10 years, GCCIX has underperformed GCGIX with an annualized return of 6.16%, while GCGIX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.15% annualized return.
GCCIX
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 4.19%
- YTD
- 14.11%
- 6M
- 19.69%
- 1Y
- 20.48%
- 3Y*
- 10.67%
- 5Y*
- 11.93%
- 10Y*
- 6.16%
GCGIX
- 1D
- 3.80%
- 1M
- -5.74%
- YTD
- -11.07%
- 6M
- -10.76%
- 1Y
- 15.42%
- 3Y*
- 23.78%
- 5Y*
- 13.52%
- 10Y*
- 16.15%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GCCIX vs. GCGIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GCCIX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than GCGIX's 0.54% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GCCIX vs. GCGIX — Risk / Return Rank
GCCIX
GCGIX
GCCIX vs. GCGIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund (GCCIX) and Goldman Sachs Large Cap Growth Insights Fund (GCGIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GCCIX | GCGIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.37 | 0.72 | +0.65 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.81 | 1.19 | +0.61 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.17 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.29 | 0.76 | +1.53 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.38 | 2.61 | +3.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GCCIX | GCGIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.37 | 0.72 | +0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | 0.61 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 | 0.75 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.16 | 0.43 | -0.59 |
Correlation
The correlation between GCCIX and GCGIX is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
GCCIX vs. GCGIX - Dividend Comparison
GCCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.10%, more than GCGIX's 8.43% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCCIX Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund | 14.10% | 16.09% | 4.08% | 4.20% | 10.41% | 16.46% | 0.36% | 10.81% | 1.47% | 5.88% | 0.84% | 0.36% |
GCGIX Goldman Sachs Large Cap Growth Insights Fund | 8.43% | 7.50% | 23.16% | 7.08% | 19.27% | 42.43% | 9.71% | 4.02% | 10.10% | 4.76% | 0.76% | 0.87% |
Drawdowns
GCCIX vs. GCGIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GCCIX drawdown since its inception was -90.80%, which is greater than GCGIX's maximum drawdown of -65.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCCIX and GCGIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GCCIX | GCGIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.80% | -65.78% | -25.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.39% | -17.25% | +7.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.78% | -32.57% | +3.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.76% | -32.94% | -24.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -71.72% | -14.11% | -57.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.41% | -20.92% | -48.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.38% | 5.04% | -1.66% |
Volatility
GCCIX vs. GCGIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund (GCCIX) is 5.48%, while Goldman Sachs Large Cap Growth Insights Fund (GCGIX) has a volatility of 6.81%. This indicates that GCCIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GCGIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GCCIX | GCGIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.48% | 6.81% | -1.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.71% | 12.55% | -0.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.19% | 23.15% | -7.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.45% | 22.25% | -3.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.13% | 21.51% | -1.38% |