PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GCCIX vs. CCRSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GCCIX vs. CCRSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund (GCCIX) and Credit Suisse Trust Commodity Return Strategy Portfolio (CCRSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GCCIX achieves a 19.18% return, which is significantly lower than CCRSX's 27.42% return. Over the past 10 years, GCCIX has underperformed CCRSX with an annualized return of 5.11%, while CCRSX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.04% annualized return.


GCCIX

1D
0.30%
1M
-1.79%
YTD
19.18%
6M
19.33%
1Y
29.96%
3Y*
14.58%
5Y*
10.60%
10Y*
5.11%

CCRSX

1D
0.35%
1M
-2.74%
YTD
27.42%
6M
26.84%
1Y
39.17%
3Y*
15.98%
5Y*
11.72%
10Y*
6.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GCCIX vs. CCRSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GCCIX
Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund
19.18%15.45%5.92%-9.65%15.70%33.42%-23.01%16.75%-14.89%4.31%
CCRSX
Credit Suisse Trust Commodity Return Strategy Portfolio
27.42%15.37%4.86%-8.88%15.71%28.00%-1.49%6.69%-11.63%-7.99%

Correlation

The correlation between GCCIX and CCRSX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2007

0.87

The correlation between GCCIX and CCRSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GCCIX vs. CCRSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GCCIX
GCCIX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
GCCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
GCCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

CCRSX
CCRSX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
CCRSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCRSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCRSX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
CCRSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCRSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GCCIX vs. CCRSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund (GCCIX) and Credit Suisse Trust Commodity Return Strategy Portfolio (CCRSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GCCIXCCRSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.43

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.08

5.27

-1.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.99

14.18

-3.19

GCCIX vs. CCRSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GCCIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is comparable to the CCRSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GCCIX and CCRSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GCCIXCCRSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.15

2.43

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.05

+0.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

0.04

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.15

-0.00

-0.15

Drawdowns

GCCIX vs. CCRSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GCCIX drawdown since its inception was -90.80%, roughly equal to the maximum CCRSX drawdown of -93.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCCIX and CCRSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GCCIXCCRSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.80%

-93.56%

+2.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.48%

-7.53%

+0.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.89%

-11.56%

-0.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.78%

-83.30%

+54.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.76%

-83.30%

+25.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-70.47%

-39.88%

-30.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-69.43%

-51.08%

-18.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.77%

2.79%

-0.02%

Volatility

GCCIX vs. CCRSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund (GCCIX) is 4.96%, while Credit Suisse Trust Commodity Return Strategy Portfolio (CCRSX) has a volatility of 5.32%. This indicates that GCCIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CCRSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GCCIXCCRSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.96%

5.32%

-0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.16%

14.26%

-2.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.37%

16.45%

-2.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.48%

225.85%

-207.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.02%

159.90%

-139.88%

GCCIX vs. CCRSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GCCIX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than CCRSX's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

GCCIX vs. CCRSX - Dividend Comparison

GCCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.50%, more than CCRSX's 10.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CCRSX
Credit Suisse Trust Commodity Return Strategy Portfolio
10.88%3.98%2.95%26.59%18.97%4.82%5.51%0.86%2.91%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GCCIX
Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund
13.50%16.09%4.08%4.20%10.41%16.46%0.36%10.81%1.47%5.88%0.84%0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, GCCIX and CCRSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

CCRSX has higher volatility (5.32%) compared to GCCIX (4.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GCCIX dropped -90.80% vs CCRSX's -93.56%.

CCRSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GCCIX and CCRSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer