PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CCRSX vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CCRSX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Credit Suisse Trust Commodity Return Strategy Portfolio (CCRSX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCRSX achieves a 26.97% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 11.69% return. Over the past 10 years, CCRSX has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 6.01%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.65% annualized return.


CCRSX

1D
1.21%
1M
-1.74%
YTD
26.97%
6M
26.90%
1Y
38.98%
3Y*
15.84%
5Y*
11.37%
10Y*
6.01%

VOO

1D
0.14%
1M
5.39%
YTD
11.69%
6M
12.11%
1Y
29.68%
3Y*
22.73%
5Y*
14.26%
10Y*
15.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCRSX vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CCRSX
Credit Suisse Trust Commodity Return Strategy Portfolio
26.97%15.37%4.86%-8.88%15.71%28.00%-1.49%6.69%-11.63%-7.99%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
11.69%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between CCRSX and VOO is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010

0.24

The correlation between CCRSX and VOO shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CCRSX vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCRSX
CCRSX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
CCRSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCRSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCRSX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
CCRSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCRSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCRSX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Credit Suisse Trust Commodity Return Strategy Portfolio (CCRSX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CCRSXVOODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.56

2.53

+0.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.19

3.43

-0.24

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.46

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.40

3.42

+1.98

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.63

15.95

-1.31

CCRSX vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCRSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.56, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCRSX and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CCRSXVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.56

2.53

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

0.85

-0.80

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

0.87

-0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.00

0.89

-0.89

Drawdowns

CCRSX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCRSX drawdown since its inception was -93.56%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCRSX and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CCRSXVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.56%

-33.99%

-59.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.53%

-8.90%

+1.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.56%

-18.69%

+7.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-83.30%

-24.52%

-58.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-83.30%

-33.99%

-49.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.09%

0.00%

-40.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-51.08%

-3.69%

-47.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.78%

1.91%

+0.87%

Volatility

CCRSX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Credit Suisse Trust Commodity Return Strategy Portfolio (CCRSX) has a higher volatility of 5.30% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.74%. This indicates that CCRSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CCRSXVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.30%

2.74%

+2.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.33%

8.88%

+5.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.48%

11.78%

+4.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

225.85%

16.81%

+209.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

159.90%

18.01%

+141.89%

CCRSX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCRSX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

CCRSX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

CCRSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.92%, more than VOO's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CCRSX
Credit Suisse Trust Commodity Return Strategy Portfolio
10.92%3.98%2.95%26.59%18.97%4.82%5.51%0.86%2.91%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.02%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


CCRSX and VOO have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CCRSX has higher volatility (5.30%) compared to VOO (2.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCRSX dropped -93.56% vs VOO's -33.99%.

CCRSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 2.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CCRSX and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer