GCC vs. QGRW

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

GCC (WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity Strategy Fund) and QGRW (WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - GCC is a Commodities fund actively managed by WisdomTree, while QGRW is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Index. GCC is actively managed, while QGRW is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, GCC returned 15.93%/yr vs 24.35%/yr for QGRW. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GCC charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for QGRW.

Performance

GCC vs. QGRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity Strategy Fund (GCC) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GCC achieves a 13.00% return, which is significantly higher than QGRW's 11.64% return.

GCC

• 1D: -0.95%
• 1M: 0.93%
• 6M: 5.99%
• YTD: 13.00%
• 1Y: 26.23%
• 3Y*: 15.93%
• 5Y*: 10.95%
• 10Y*: 6.14%

QGRW

• 1D: -1.52%
• 1M: -0.67%
• 6M: 11.22%
• YTD: 11.64%
• 1Y: 23.64%
• 3Y*: 24.35%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GCC vs. QGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
GCC WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity Strategy Fund	13.00%	20.01%	15.13%	-3.72%	0.06%
QGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund	11.64%	19.20%	34.85%	56.05%	-3.07%

Correlation

The correlation between GCC and QGRW is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.21
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.19
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2022	0.20

Return for Risk

GCC vs. QGRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GCC

GCC Risk / Return Rank: 48
GCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
GCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
GCC Omega Ratio Rank: 56
GCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
GCC Martin Ratio Rank: 42

QGRW

QGRW Risk / Return Rank: 41
QGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
QGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
QGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 41
QGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
QGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GCC vs. QGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity Strategy Fund (GCC) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GCC	QGRW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.51	1.25	+0.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.93	1.76	+0.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.22	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.66	1.54	+0.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.47	5.54	-0.08

GCC vs. QGRW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GCC Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is comparable to the QGRW Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GCC and QGRW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GCC vs. QGRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GCC drawdown since its inception was -63.19%, which is greater than QGRW's maximum drawdown of -24.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCC and QGRW.

Drawdown Indicators

	GCC	QGRW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.19%	-24.40%	-38.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.86%	-15.44%	-0.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.86%	-24.40%	+8.54%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.07%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.31%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.78%	-4.56%	-5.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-34.76%	-3.30%	-31.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.81%	4.27%	+0.54%

Volatility

GCC vs. QGRW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity Strategy Fund (GCC) is 5.16%, while WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW) has a volatility of 5.71%. This indicates that GCC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QGRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GCC	QGRW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.16%	5.71%	-0.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.12%	15.53%	-0.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.47%	18.93%	-1.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.99%	21.22%	-4.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.83%	21.22%	-6.39%

GCC vs. QGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

GCC has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than QGRW's 0.28% expense ratio.

Dividends

GCC vs. QGRW - Dividend Comparison

GCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.87%, more than QGRW's 0.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
GCC WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity Strategy Fund	5.87%	6.64%	3.51%	3.68%	22.49%	9.76%
QGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund	0.08%	0.09%	0.14%	0.11%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GCC and QGRW in my portfolio?

GCC and QGRW have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GCC or QGRW?

QGRW has higher volatility (5.71%) compared to GCC (5.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GCC dropped -63.19% vs QGRW's -24.40%.

Which ETF is better, GCC or QGRW?

On 3-year performance, QGRW leads with 24.35% vs 15.93% for GCC. On fees, QGRW is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, GCC has been the lower-risk option at 5.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GCC or QGRW?

Over the 3-year period, QGRW has performed better with a 24.35% return vs 15.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GCC or QGRW?

QGRW is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for GCC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GCC or QGRW?

GCC has the higher dividend yield at 5.87%, compared with 0.08% for QGRW.

What is the main difference between GCC and QGRW?

GCC is categorized as Commodities, while QGRW is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for GCC and 0.28% for QGRW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GCC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.