GC=F vs. USFR
GC=F (Gold Futures) is an asset, while USFR (WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund) is Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
GC=F vs. USFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GC=F
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USFR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 1.66%
- 6M
- 1.98%
- 1Y
- 4.03%
- 3Y*
- 4.74%
- 5Y*
- 3.67%
- 10Y*
- 2.41%
GC=F vs. USFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GC=F Gold Futures | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.91% |
USFR WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund | 1.66% | 4.23% | 5.47% | 5.18% | 1.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between GC=F and USFR is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2022 | -0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GC=F vs. USFR — Risk / Return Rank
GC=F
USFR
GC=F vs. USFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gold Futures (GC=F) and WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GC=F | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 14.95 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 9.30 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 3.09 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 1.61 | — |
Drawdowns
GC=F vs. USFR - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GC=F | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -1.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -0.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -0.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | 0.00% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -0.16% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.01% | — |
Volatility
GC=F vs. USFR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GC=F | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.08% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.19% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.27% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 0.40% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 0.78% | — |
Frequently Asked Questions
GC=F and USFR have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for GC=F and USFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer