GBUG vs. IAUI
GBUG (Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF) and IAUI (NEOS Gold High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GBUG is a Gold fund actively managed by Sprott, while IAUI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Neos. Both are actively managed. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GBUG charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for IAUI.
Performance
GBUG vs. IAUI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GBUG achieves a -1.44% return, which is significantly lower than IAUI's 2.26% return.
GBUG
- 1D
- 1.17%
- 1M
- 0.96%
- YTD
- -1.44%
- 6M
- 7.57%
- 1Y
- 63.04%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IAUI
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- -1.21%
- YTD
- 2.26%
- 6M
- 4.46%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GBUG vs. IAUI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GBUG Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF | -1.44% | 64.14% |
IAUI NEOS Gold High Income ETF | 2.26% | 20.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between GBUG and IAUI is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2025 | 0.76 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GBUG vs. IAUI — Risk / Return Rank
GBUG
IAUI
GBUG vs. IAUI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF (GBUG) and NEOS Gold High Income ETF (IAUI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GBUG | IAUI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.97 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.05 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GBUG | IAUI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.33 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.74 | 1.16 | +0.58 |
Drawdowns
GBUG vs. IAUI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GBUG drawdown since its inception was -32.10%, which is greater than IAUI's maximum drawdown of -16.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBUG and IAUI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GBUG | IAUI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.10% | -16.88% | -15.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.10% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.98% | -13.27% | -12.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.68% | -3.49% | -4.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.52% | — | — |
Volatility
GBUG vs. IAUI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GBUG | IAUI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.44% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.41% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.62% | 20.28% | +27.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.31% | 20.28% | +27.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.31% | 20.28% | +27.03% |
GBUG vs. IAUI - Expense Ratio Comparison
GBUG has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than IAUI's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
GBUG vs. IAUI - Dividend Comparison
GBUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, less than IAUI's 12.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
GBUG Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF | 1.58% | 1.56% |
IAUI NEOS Gold High Income ETF | 12.58% | 6.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GBUG and IAUI have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IAUI is cheaper at 0.78% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IAUI is cheaper with a 0.78% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for GBUG.
IAUI has the higher dividend yield at 12.58%, compared with 1.58% for GBUG.
GBUG is categorized as Gold, while IAUI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Sprott and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for GBUG and 0.78% for IAUI.
Find the right allocation for GBUG and IAUI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer