GBUG vs. GOEX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

GBUG (Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF) and GOEX (Global X Gold Explorers ETF) are both Gold funds. GBUG is actively managed, while GOEX is passively managed. Over the past year, GBUG returned 59.61% vs 60.99% for GOEX. Their 0.96 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. GBUG charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for GOEX.

Performance

GBUG vs. GOEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF (GBUG) and Global X Gold Explorers ETF (GOEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GBUG achieves a -11.43% return, which is significantly higher than GOEX's -14.85% return.

GBUG

• 1D: -3.48%
• 1M: -5.07%
• 6M: -17.22%
• YTD: -11.43%
• 1Y: 59.61%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 60.10%

GOEX

• 1D: -3.78%
• 1M: -5.18%
• 6M: -20.91%
• YTD: -14.85%
• 1Y: 60.99%
• 3Y*: 42.10%
• 5Y*: 19.04%
• 10Y*: 9.57%
• ALL TIME*: 0.24%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GBUG Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF	$1.01M	$985.52K	$1.44M
GOEX Global X Gold Explorers ETF	$302.55K	$389.74K	$635.93K

GBUG vs. GOEX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GBUG Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF	-11.43%	122.37%
GOEX Global X Gold Explorers ETF	-14.85%	140.88%

Correlation

The correlation between GBUG and GOEX is 0.97 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025	0.96

The correlation between GBUG and GOEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GBUG vs. GOEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GBUG

GBUG Risk / Return Rank: 45
GBUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
GBUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
GBUG Omega Ratio Rank: 49
GBUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
GBUG Martin Ratio Rank: 36

GOEX

GOEX Risk / Return Rank: 44
GOEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
GOEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
GOEX Omega Ratio Rank: 47
GOEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
GOEX Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GBUG vs. GOEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF (GBUG) and Global X Gold Explorers ETF (GOEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GBUG	GOEX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.21	1.18	+0.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.65	1.64	+0.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.22	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.67	1.56	+0.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.51	3.27	+0.24

GBUG vs. GOEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GBUG Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is comparable to the GOEX Sharpe Ratio of 1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GBUG and GOEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GBUG vs. GOEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GBUG drawdown since its inception was -37.35%, smaller than the maximum GOEX drawdown of -88.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBUG and GOEX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GBUG	GOEX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.35%	-88.83%	+51.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-37.35%	-39.87%	+2.52%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-39.87%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-47.16%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-53.66%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-33.49%	-37.16%	+3.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.30%	-63.28%	+52.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.73%	19.02%	-1.29%

Volatility

GBUG vs. GOEX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF (GBUG) is 14.21%, while Global X Gold Explorers ETF (GOEX) has a volatility of 14.97%. This indicates that GBUG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GOEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GBUG	GOEX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.21%	14.97%	-0.76%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	42.45%	42.64%	-0.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	51.46%	52.89%	-1.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	48.42%	40.03%	+8.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	48.42%	40.14%	+8.28%

GBUG vs. GOEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GBUG has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than GOEX's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

GBUG vs. GOEX - Dividend Comparison

GBUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, less than GOEX's 2.58% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GBUG Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF	1.76%	1.56%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GOEX Global X Gold Explorers ETF	2.58%	2.08%	2.46%	0.05%	1.04%	2.35%	2.62%	1.60%	0.00%	0.00%	38.91%	11.70%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GBUG and GOEX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.97, GBUG and GOEX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, GBUG or GOEX?

GOEX has higher volatility (14.97%) compared to GBUG (14.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GBUG dropped -37.35% vs GOEX's -88.83%.

Which ETF is better, GBUG or GOEX?

On 1-year performance, GOEX leads with 60.99% vs 59.61% for GBUG. On fees, GOEX is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, GBUG has been the lower-risk option at 14.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GBUG or GOEX?

Over the 1-year period, GOEX has performed better with a 60.99% return vs 59.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GBUG or GOEX?

GOEX is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for GBUG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GBUG or GOEX?

GOEX has the higher dividend yield at 2.58%, compared with 1.76% for GBUG.

What is the main difference between GBUG and GOEX?

They also come from different issuers: Sprott and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for GBUG and 0.65% for GOEX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GBUG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.21 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.