GBTC vs. GSIB

Last updated Jun 10, 2026

GBTC (Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF) and GSIB (Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GBTC is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CoinDesk Bitcoin Benchmark Rate Index, while GSIB is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by Themes. GBTC is passively managed, while GSIB is actively managed. Over the past year, GBTC returned -43.81% vs 41.35% for GSIB. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GBTC charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for GSIB.

Performance

GBTC vs. GSIB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF (GBTC) and Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GBTC achieves a -29.58% return, which is significantly lower than GSIB's 10.48% return.

GBTC

• 1D: -2.09%
• 1M: -22.74%
• YTD: -29.58%
• 6M: -33.89%
• 1Y: -43.81%
• 3Y*: 52.63%
• 5Y*: 9.63%
• 10Y*: 48.94%

GSIB

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 4.13%
• YTD: 10.48%
• 6M: 15.45%
• 1Y: 41.35%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GBTC vs. GSIB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
GBTC Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF	-29.58%	-7.65%	113.81%	-0.80%
GSIB Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF	10.48%	61.67%	32.86%	1.75%

Correlation

The correlation between GBTC and GSIB is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.30
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2023	0.28

Return for Risk

GBTC vs. GSIB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GBTC

GBTC Risk / Return Rank: 2
GBTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
GBTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
GBTC Omega Ratio Rank: 2
GBTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
GBTC Martin Ratio Rank: 1

GSIB

GSIB Risk / Return Rank: 76
GSIB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
GSIB Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
GSIB Omega Ratio Rank: 77
GSIB Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
GSIB Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GBTC vs. GSIB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF (GBTC) and Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GBTC	GSIB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.00	2.39	-3.39
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.47	3.33	-4.80
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.84	1.40	-0.56
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.84	2.99	-3.83
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.49	10.53	-12.02
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GBTC vs. GSIB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GBTC Sharpe Ratio is -1.00, which is lower than the GSIB Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GBTC and GSIB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GBTC	GSIB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.00	2.39	-3.39
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.16	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.60	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.66	2.33	-1.67

Drawdowns

GBTC vs. GSIB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GBTC drawdown since its inception was -89.91%, which is greater than GSIB's maximum drawdown of -17.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBTC and GSIB.

Drawdown Indicators

	GBTC	GSIB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-89.91%	-17.71%	-72.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-52.45%	-13.90%	-38.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-52.45%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-85.42%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-89.91%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-51.09%	-1.05%	-50.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-43.42%	-2.05%	-41.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	29.34%	3.94%	+25.40%

Volatility

GBTC vs. GSIB - Volatility Comparison

Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF (GBTC) has a higher volatility of 11.72% compared to Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB) at 4.58%. This indicates that GBTC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSIB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GBTC	GSIB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.72%	4.58%	+7.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	34.45%	14.12%	+20.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	44.14%	17.35%	+26.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	62.26%	18.44%	+43.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	82.21%	18.44%	+63.77%

GBTC vs. GSIB - Expense Ratio Comparison

GBTC has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than GSIB's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

GBTC vs. GSIB - Dividend Comparison

GBTC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GSIB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GBTC Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	5.61%
GSIB Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF	1.73%	1.91%	1.67%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GBTC and GSIB in my portfolio?

GBTC and GSIB have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GBTC or GSIB?

GBTC has higher volatility (11.72%) compared to GSIB (4.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GBTC dropped -89.91% vs GSIB's -17.71%.

Which ETF is better, GBTC or GSIB?

On 1-year performance, GSIB leads with 41.35% vs -43.81% for GBTC. On fees, GSIB is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, GSIB has been the lower-risk option at 4.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GBTC or GSIB?

Over the 1-year period, GSIB has performed better with a 41.35% return vs -43.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GBTC or GSIB?

GSIB is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for GBTC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GBTC or GSIB?

GSIB has the higher dividend yield at 1.73%, compared with 0.00% for GBTC.

What is the main difference between GBTC and GSIB?

GBTC is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while GSIB is Financials Equities. They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and Themes. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for GBTC and 0.35% for GSIB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GSIB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs -1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.