PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GBTC vs. ETCG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GBTC vs. ETCG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF (GBTC) and Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC) (ETCG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GBTC achieves a -27.25% return, which is significantly higher than ETCG's -47.46% return.


GBTC

1D
0.61%
1M
4.39%
6M
-16.57%
YTD
-27.25%
1Y
-44.89%
3Y*
37.28%
5Y*
8.08%
10Y*
49.90%
ALL TIME*
54.71%

ETCG

1D
1.43%
1M
-13.06%
6M
-34.35%
YTD
-47.46%
1Y
-66.78%
3Y*
-20.02%
5Y*
-37.77%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-22.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$62.63K$57.03K$104.25K
$77.84M$75.78M$100.19M

GBTC vs. ETCG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
GBTC
Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF
-27.25%-7.65%113.81%317.61%-75.80%7.03%290.72%106.56%-73.51%
ETCG
Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC)
-47.46%-39.78%-9.57%289.22%-80.45%145.11%-10.70%7.52%-74.91%

Correlation

The correlation between GBTC and ETCG is 0.69, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2018

0.61

The correlation between GBTC and ETCG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GBTC vs. ETCG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GBTC
GBTC Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
GBTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GBTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
GBTC Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
GBTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
GBTC Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

ETCG
ETCG Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
ETCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETCG Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
ETCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETCG Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GBTC vs. ETCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF (GBTC) and Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC) (ETCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GBTCETCGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.83

0.76

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.84

-0.92

+0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.28

-1.30

+0.02

GBTC vs. ETCG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GBTC Sharpe Ratio is -1.02, which is comparable to the ETCG Sharpe Ratio of -1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GBTC and ETCG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GBTC vs. ETCG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GBTC drawdown since its inception was -89.91%, smaller than the maximum ETCG drawdown of -96.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBTC and ETCG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GBTCETCGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.91%

-96.59%

+6.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.75%

-72.70%

+18.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-53.75%

-82.25%

+28.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-85.42%

-92.70%

+7.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-89.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-49.48%

-96.20%

+46.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.52%

-82.89%

+39.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

35.20%

51.47%

-16.27%

Volatility

GBTC vs. ETCG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF (GBTC) is 8.10%, while Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC) (ETCG) has a volatility of 9.74%. This indicates that GBTC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ETCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GBTCETCGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.10%

9.74%

-1.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.98%

33.37%

-0.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.30%

57.25%

-12.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

60.53%

90.69%

-30.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

81.15%

114.27%

-33.12%

GBTC vs. ETCG - Expense Ratio Comparison

GBTC has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is lower than ETCG's 2.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

GBTC vs. ETCG - Dividend Comparison

Neither GBTC nor ETCG has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
ETCG
Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GBTC
Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%5.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


GBTC and ETCG have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ETCG has higher volatility (9.74%) compared to GBTC (8.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GBTC dropped -89.91% vs ETCG's -96.59%.

On 5-year performance, GBTC leads with 8.08% vs -37.77% for ETCG. On fees, GBTC is cheaper at 1.50% per year. On volatility, GBTC has been the lower-risk option at 8.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GBTC has performed better with a 8.08% return vs -37.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GBTC is cheaper with a 1.50% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for ETCG.

GBTC and ETCG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

GBTC tracks CoinDesk Bitcoin Benchmark Rate Index, while ETCG tracks Ethereum Classic (ETC). Their fees differ too: 1.50% for GBTC and 2.50% for ETCG.

GBTC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.02 vs -1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GBTC and ETCG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer