GBND vs. IBTM

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

GBND (Goldman Sachs Core Bond ETF) and IBTM (iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Treasury ETF) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GBND charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for IBTM.

Performance

GBND vs. IBTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Core Bond ETF (GBND) and iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Treasury ETF (IBTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GBND achieves a 0.36% return, which is significantly higher than IBTM's -0.36% return.

GBND

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: 0.18%
• YTD: 0.36%
• 6M: 0.49%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IBTM

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: -0.11%
• YTD: -0.36%
• 6M: -0.38%
• 1Y: 3.43%
• 3Y*: 2.74%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GBND vs. IBTM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GBND Goldman Sachs Core Bond ETF	0.36%	3.49%
IBTM iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Treasury ETF	-0.36%	2.65%

Correlation

The correlation between GBND and IBTM is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025	0.90

Return for Risk

GBND vs. IBTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBTM

IBTM Risk / Return Rank: 24
IBTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
IBTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
IBTM Omega Ratio Rank: 23
IBTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
IBTM Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GBND vs. IBTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Core Bond ETF (GBND) and iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Treasury ETF (IBTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GBND	IBTM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.85	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.15	0.20	+0.94

Drawdowns

GBND vs. IBTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GBND drawdown since its inception was -2.76%, smaller than the maximum IBTM drawdown of -13.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBND and IBTM.

Drawdown Indicators

	GBND	IBTM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.76%	-13.60%	+10.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-3.26%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-7.86%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.38%	-2.25%	+0.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.64%	-4.82%	+4.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.13%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GBND	IBTM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.20%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	2.75%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.61%	4.09%	-0.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.61%	7.55%	-3.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.61%	7.55%	-3.94%

GBND vs. IBTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

GBND has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than IBTM's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

GBND vs. IBTM - Dividend Comparison

GBND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.45%, less than IBTM's 3.95% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
GBND Goldman Sachs Core Bond ETF	3.45%	2.20%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IBTM iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Treasury ETF	3.95%	3.87%	3.96%	3.39%	1.38%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GBND and IBTM in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, GBND and IBTM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, GBND or IBTM?

On fees, IBTM is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GBND or IBTM?

IBTM is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for GBND.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GBND or IBTM?

IBTM has the higher dividend yield at 3.95%, compared with 3.45% for GBND.

What is the main difference between GBND and IBTM?

They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for GBND and 0.07% for IBTM.