GAUG vs. HOCT
GAUG (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - August) and HOCT (Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October) are both Options Trading funds. GAUG is passively managed, while HOCT is actively managed. GAUG charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for HOCT.
Performance
GAUG vs. HOCT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GAUG
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 1.59%
- YTD
- 4.97%
- 6M
- 5.40%
- 1Y
- 14.06%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HOCT
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GAUG vs. HOCT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
GAUG FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - August | 4.14% |
HOCT Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October | 0.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GAUG vs. HOCT — Risk / Return Rank
GAUG
HOCT
GAUG vs. HOCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - August (GAUG) and Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October (HOCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GAUG | HOCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.52 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.35 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GAUG | HOCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.65 | — | — |
Drawdowns
GAUG vs. HOCT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GAUG drawdown since its inception was -10.08%, which is greater than HOCT's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAUG and HOCT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GAUG | HOCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.08% | 0.00% | -10.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.01% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.18% | 0.00% | -0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.73% | 0.00% | -0.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.77% | — | — |
Volatility
GAUG vs. HOCT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GAUG | HOCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.75% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.33% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.70% | 0.00% | +5.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.53% | 0.00% | +7.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.53% | 0.00% | +7.53% |
GAUG vs. HOCT - Expense Ratio Comparison
GAUG has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than HOCT's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
GAUG vs. HOCT - Dividend Comparison
Neither GAUG nor HOCT has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, HOCT is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HOCT is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for GAUG.
GAUG and HOCT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for GAUG and 0.79% for HOCT.
Find the right allocation for GAUG and HOCT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer