PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GAUG vs. FDND
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GAUG vs. FDND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - August (GAUG) and FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF (FDND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GAUG achieves a 4.89% return, which is significantly higher than FDND's -5.36% return.


GAUG

1D
-0.29%
1M
0.26%
YTD
4.89%
6M
4.49%
1Y
13.13%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FDND

1D
-0.46%
1M
-5.74%
YTD
-5.36%
6M
-6.14%
1Y
-1.75%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GAUG vs. FDND - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GAUG and FDND is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2024

0.70

The correlation between GAUG and FDND has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GAUG vs. FDND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GAUG
GAUG Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
GAUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GAUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
GAUG Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
GAUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
GAUG Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

FDND
FDND Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
FDND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDND Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDND Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
FDND Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDND Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GAUG vs. FDND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - August (GAUG) and FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF (FDND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GAUGFDNDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.00

+0.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.29

-0.09

+3.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.10

-0.20

+17.30

GAUG vs. FDND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GAUG Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is higher than the FDND Sharpe Ratio of -0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GAUG and FDND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GAUG vs. FDND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GAUG drawdown since its inception was -10.08%, smaller than the maximum FDND drawdown of -24.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAUG and FDND.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GAUGFDNDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.08%

-24.12%

+14.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.01%

-20.49%

+16.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.34%

-11.51%

+11.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.72%

-5.73%

+5.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.77%

8.62%

-7.85%

Volatility

GAUG vs. FDND - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - August (GAUG) is 1.30%, while FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF (FDND) has a volatility of 7.22%. This indicates that GAUG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GAUGFDNDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.30%

7.22%

-5.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.41%

15.02%

-10.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.62%

18.96%

-13.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.49%

21.49%

-14.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.49%

21.49%

-14.00%

GAUG vs. FDND - Expense Ratio Comparison

GAUG has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than FDND's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

GAUG vs. FDND - Dividend Comparison

GAUG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FDND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.63%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GAUG and FDND have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDND has higher volatility (7.22%) compared to GAUG (1.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GAUG dropped -10.08% vs FDND's -24.12%.

On 1-year performance, GAUG leads with 13.13% vs -1.75% for FDND. On fees, FDND is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, GAUG has been the lower-risk option at 1.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GAUG has performed better with a 13.13% return vs -1.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDND is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for GAUG.

FDND has the higher dividend yield at 8.63%, compared with 0.00% for GAUG.

GAUG is categorized as Options Trading, while FDND is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for GAUG and 0.75% for FDND.

GAUG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs -0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GAUG and FDND

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer