GAUD vs. SCDL

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

GAUD (Guinness Atkinson US Dividend Builder ETF) and SCDL (ETRACS 2x Leveraged U.S. Dividend Factor TR ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - GAUD is a Dividend fund actively managed by Guinness Atkinson, while SCDL is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 (200%). GAUD is actively managed, while SCDL is passively managed. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GAUD charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SCDL.

Performance

GAUD vs. SCDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Guinness Atkinson US Dividend Builder ETF (GAUD) and ETRACS 2x Leveraged U.S. Dividend Factor TR ETN (SCDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GAUD achieves a -0.92% return, which is significantly lower than SCDL's 42.70% return.

GAUD

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.65%
• 6M: -3.58%
• YTD: -0.92%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SCDL

• 1D: -0.63%
• 1M: 7.31%
• 6M: 29.60%
• YTD: 42.70%
• 1Y: 47.42%
• 3Y*: 21.17%
• 5Y*: 11.28%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GAUD vs. SCDL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GAUD Guinness Atkinson US Dividend Builder ETF	-0.92%	-1.12%
SCDL ETRACS 2x Leveraged U.S. Dividend Factor TR ETN	42.70%	-0.33%

Correlation

The correlation between GAUD and SCDL is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2025	0.63

Return for Risk

GAUD vs. SCDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GAUD

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SCDL

SCDL Risk / Return Rank: 85
SCDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
SCDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
SCDL Omega Ratio Rank: 79
SCDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
SCDL Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GAUD vs. SCDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guinness Atkinson US Dividend Builder ETF (GAUD) and ETRACS 2x Leveraged U.S. Dividend Factor TR ETN (SCDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GAUD	SCDL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.20	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.19	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.36	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	4.68	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	11.66	—

Drawdowns

GAUD vs. SCDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GAUD drawdown since its inception was -9.17%, smaller than the maximum SCDL drawdown of -34.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAUD and SCDL.

Drawdown Indicators

	GAUD	SCDL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.17%	-34.87%	+25.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-10.19%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-32.79%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-34.87%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.30%	-0.63%	-3.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.59%	-11.76%	+8.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.08%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GAUD	SCDL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	8.09%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	15.31%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.30%	21.77%	-10.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.30%	29.03%	-17.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.30%	28.79%	-17.49%

GAUD vs. SCDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

GAUD has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than SCDL's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

GAUD vs. SCDL - Dividend Comparison

Neither GAUD nor SCDL has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM
GAUD Guinness Atkinson US Dividend Builder ETF	0.61%
SCDL ETRACS 2x Leveraged U.S. Dividend Factor TR ETN	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GAUD and SCDL in my portfolio?

GAUD and SCDL have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GAUD or SCDL?

On fees, GAUD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GAUD or SCDL?

GAUD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SCDL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GAUD or SCDL?

GAUD has the higher dividend yield at 0.61%, compared with 0.00% for SCDL.

What is the main difference between GAUD and SCDL?

GAUD is categorized as Dividend, while SCDL is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Guinness Atkinson and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for GAUD and 0.95% for SCDL.