GARY vs. GVIP

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

GARY (Mango Growth ETF) and GVIP (Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. GARY is actively managed, while GVIP is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GARY charges 0.77%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for GVIP.

Performance

GARY vs. GVIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mango Growth ETF (GARY) and Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF (GVIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GARY achieves a 32.07% return, which is significantly higher than GVIP's 17.09% return.

GARY

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 2.29%
• 6M: 25.73%
• YTD: 32.07%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GVIP

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: 3.10%
• 6M: 14.46%
• YTD: 17.09%
• 1Y: 31.79%
• 3Y*: 28.61%
• 5Y*: 12.52%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GARY vs. GVIP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GARY Mango Growth ETF	32.07%	0.15%
GVIP Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF	17.09%	0.99%

Correlation

The correlation between GARY and GVIP is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2025	0.86

Return for Risk

GARY vs. GVIP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GARY

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GVIP

GVIP Risk / Return Rank: 55
GVIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
GVIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
GVIP Omega Ratio Rank: 52
GVIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
GVIP Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GARY vs. GVIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mango Growth ETF (GARY) and Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF (GVIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GARY	GVIP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.45	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.96	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.26	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.29	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	9.11	—

Drawdowns

GARY vs. GVIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GARY drawdown since its inception was -10.28%, smaller than the maximum GVIP drawdown of -37.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GARY and GVIP.

Drawdown Indicators

	GARY	GVIP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.28%	-37.09%	+26.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-13.67%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.29%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-37.09%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.75%	-5.41%	+1.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.84%	-7.55%	+5.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.43%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GARY	GVIP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	11.69%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	18.60%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.79%	21.64%	+0.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.79%	21.95%	-0.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.79%	21.90%	-0.11%

GARY vs. GVIP - Expense Ratio Comparison

GARY has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than GVIP's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

GARY vs. GVIP - Dividend Comparison

GARY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than GVIP's 0.29% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
GARY Mango Growth ETF	0.04%	0.05%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GVIP Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF	0.29%	0.34%	0.29%	0.77%	0.02%	0.00%	0.12%	0.77%	0.44%	0.45%	0.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GARY and GVIP in my portfolio?

GARY and GVIP have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GARY or GVIP?

On fees, GVIP is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GARY or GVIP?

GVIP is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for GARY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GARY or GVIP?

GVIP has the higher dividend yield at 0.29%, compared with 0.04% for GARY.

What is the main difference between GARY and GVIP?

They also come from different issuers: Mango and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.77% for GARY and 0.45% for GVIP.