PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GARY vs. GARP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GARY vs. GARP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mango Growth ETF (GARY) and iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GARY achieves a 25.69% return, which is significantly higher than GARP's 16.89% return.


GARY

1D
0.88%
1M
-4.25%
6M
15.73%
YTD
25.69%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

GARP

1D
0.66%
1M
-1.22%
6M
14.45%
YTD
16.89%
1Y
31.75%
3Y*
28.85%
5Y*
17.48%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
20.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$25.65M$25.43M$23.00M
$600.48K$395.06K$299.75K

GARY vs. GARP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
GARY
Mango Growth ETF
25.69%0.15%
GARP
iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF
16.89%-0.23%

Correlation

The correlation between GARY and GARP is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2025

0.94

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GARY vs. GARP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GARY

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


GARP
GARP Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
GARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
GARP Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
GARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
GARP Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GARY vs. GARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mango Growth ETF (GARY) and iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GARYGARPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.99

GARY vs. GARP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GARY vs. GARP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GARY drawdown since its inception was -12.67%, smaller than the maximum GARP drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GARY and GARP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GARYGARPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.67%

-31.34%

+18.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.40%

-4.34%

-4.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.40%

-7.27%

+4.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.75%

Volatility

GARY vs. GARP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GARYGARPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.34%

20.02%

+2.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.34%

22.34%

0.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.34%

23.92%

-1.58%

GARY vs. GARP - Expense Ratio Comparison

GARY has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than GARP's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

GARY vs. GARP - Dividend Comparison

GARY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than GARP's 0.27% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
GARP
iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF
0.27%0.31%0.38%0.75%1.85%0.67%0.75%
GARY
Mango Growth ETF
0.04%0.05%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, GARY and GARP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, GARP is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GARP is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for GARY.

GARP has the higher dividend yield at 0.27%, compared with 0.04% for GARY.

GARY is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while GARP is Quality Factor. They also come from different issuers: Mango and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.77% for GARY and 0.15% for GARP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GARY and GARP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer