PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GARY vs. ARWG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GARY vs. ARWG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mango Growth ETF (GARY) and Archer Growth ETF (ARWG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GARY achieves a 30.72% return, which is significantly higher than ARWG's 6.56% return.


GARY

1D
-0.73%
1M
12.07%
YTD
30.72%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ARWG

1D
-0.54%
1M
4.60%
YTD
6.56%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GARY vs. ARWG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
GARY
Mango Growth ETF
30.72%-0.67%
ARWG
Archer Growth ETF
6.56%-0.57%

Correlation

The correlation between GARY and ARWG is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2025

0.63

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GARY vs. ARWG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mango Growth ETF (GARY) and Archer Growth ETF (ARWG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GARY vs. ARWG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GARYARWGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

4.42

0.70

+3.72

Drawdowns

GARY vs. ARWG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GARY drawdown since its inception was -10.28%, smaller than the maximum ARWG drawdown of -12.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GARY and ARWG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GARYARWGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.28%

-12.79%

+2.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.73%

-0.54%

-0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.69%

-3.42%

+1.73%

Volatility

GARY vs. ARWG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GARYARWGDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.25%

21.03%

-1.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.25%

21.03%

-1.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.25%

21.03%

-1.78%

GARY vs. ARWG - Expense Ratio Comparison

GARY has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is lower than ARWG's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

GARY vs. ARWG - Dividend Comparison

GARY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than ARWG's 0.13% yield.


PositionTTM2025
ARWG
Archer Growth ETF
0.13%0.00%
GARY
Mango Growth ETF
0.04%0.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


GARY and ARWG have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GARY is cheaper at 0.77% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GARY is cheaper with a 0.77% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for ARWG.

ARWG has the higher dividend yield at 0.13%, compared with 0.04% for GARY.

They also come from different issuers: Mango and Archer Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.77% for GARY and 0.85% for ARWG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GARY and ARWG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer