GARY vs. ARWG

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

GARY (Mango Growth ETF) and ARWG (Archer Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GARY charges 0.77%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for ARWG.

Performance

GARY vs. ARWG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mango Growth ETF (GARY) and Archer Growth ETF (ARWG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GARY achieves a 32.07% return, which is significantly higher than ARWG's 7.78% return.

GARY

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 2.29%
• 6M: 25.73%
• YTD: 32.07%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ARWG

• 1D: -0.68%
• 1M: 5.21%
• 6M: 6.36%
• YTD: 7.78%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GARY vs. ARWG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GARY Mango Growth ETF	32.07%	-0.81%
ARWG Archer Growth ETF	7.78%	-0.95%

Correlation

The correlation between GARY and ARWG is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2025	0.72

Return for Risk

GARY vs. ARWG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mango Growth ETF (GARY) and Archer Growth ETF (ARWG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

GARY vs. ARWG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GARY drawdown since its inception was -10.28%, smaller than the maximum ARWG drawdown of -12.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GARY and ARWG.

Drawdown Indicators

	GARY	ARWG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.28%	-12.79%	+2.51%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.75%	-1.72%	-2.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.84%	-3.24%	+1.40%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GARY	ARWG	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.79%	23.60%	-1.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.79%	23.60%	-1.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.79%	23.60%	-1.81%

GARY vs. ARWG - Expense Ratio Comparison

GARY has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is lower than ARWG's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

GARY vs. ARWG - Dividend Comparison

GARY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than ARWG's 0.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
ARWG Archer Growth ETF	0.13%	0.00%
GARY Mango Growth ETF	0.04%	0.05%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GARY and ARWG in my portfolio?

GARY and ARWG have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GARY or ARWG?

On fees, GARY is cheaper at 0.77% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GARY or ARWG?

GARY is cheaper with a 0.77% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for ARWG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GARY or ARWG?

ARWG has the higher dividend yield at 0.13%, compared with 0.04% for GARY.

What is the main difference between GARY and ARWG?

They also come from different issuers: Mango and Archer Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.77% for GARY and 0.85% for ARWG.