PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GARP vs. QIDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GARP vs. QIDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) and Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF (QIDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GARP achieves a 16.89% return, which is significantly higher than QIDX's 10.40% return.


GARP

1D
0.66%
1M
-1.22%
6M
14.45%
YTD
16.89%
1Y
31.75%
3Y*
28.85%
5Y*
17.48%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
20.07%

QIDX

1D
0.55%
1M
0.29%
6M
6.42%
YTD
10.40%
1Y
14.22%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$25.65M$25.43M$23.00M
$53.70K$62.72K$42.16K

GARP vs. QIDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GARP and QIDX is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2025

0.70

The correlation between GARP and QIDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GARP vs. QIDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GARP
GARP Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
GARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
GARP Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
GARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
GARP Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

QIDX
QIDX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
QIDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QIDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
QIDX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
QIDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
QIDX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GARP vs. QIDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) and Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF (QIDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GARPQIDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.21

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.19

1.90

+0.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.99

6.38

+1.61

GARP vs. QIDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GARP Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is comparable to the QIDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GARP and QIDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GARP vs. QIDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GARP drawdown since its inception was -31.34%, which is greater than QIDX's maximum drawdown of -14.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GARP and QIDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GARPQIDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.34%

-14.99%

-16.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.69%

-6.92%

-6.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.34%

-0.44%

-3.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.27%

-2.13%

-5.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.75%

2.06%

+1.69%

Volatility

GARP vs. QIDX - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) has a higher volatility of 5.68% compared to Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF (QIDX) at 2.55%. This indicates that GARP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QIDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GARPQIDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.68%

2.55%

+3.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.18%

8.24%

+7.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.02%

11.02%

+9.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.34%

14.20%

+8.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.92%

14.20%

+9.72%

GARP vs. QIDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GARP has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than QIDX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

GARP vs. QIDX - Dividend Comparison

GARP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, less than QIDX's 0.86% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
GARP
iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF
0.27%0.31%0.38%0.75%1.85%0.67%0.75%
QIDX
Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF
0.86%0.84%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GARP and QIDX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GARP has higher volatility (5.68%) compared to QIDX (2.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GARP dropped -31.34% vs QIDX's -14.99%.

On 1-year performance, GARP leads with 31.75% vs 14.22% for QIDX. On fees, GARP is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QIDX has been the lower-risk option at 2.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GARP has performed better with a 31.75% return vs 14.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GARP is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for QIDX.

QIDX has the higher dividend yield at 0.86%, compared with 0.27% for GARP.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Indexperts. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for GARP and 0.50% for QIDX.

GARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GARP and QIDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer