PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GARP vs. QARP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GARP vs. QARP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) and Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GARP achieves a 17.68% return, which is significantly higher than QARP's 12.78% return.


GARP

1D
-1.40%
1M
-0.82%
6M
15.53%
YTD
17.68%
1Y
31.60%
3Y*
29.17%
5Y*
18.08%
10Y*

QARP

1D
0.71%
1M
1.10%
6M
9.34%
YTD
12.78%
1Y
25.00%
3Y*
17.33%
5Y*
12.09%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GARP vs. QARP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
GARP
iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF
17.68%21.49%37.42%42.86%-26.75%27.99%26.51%
QARP
Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF
12.78%13.99%18.94%23.03%-14.62%31.82%12.63%

Correlation

The correlation between GARP and QARP is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2020

0.80

The correlation between GARP and QARP shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.85 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GARP vs. QARP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GARP
QARP

Technology

54.7%
23.5%

Communication Services

11.4%
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

8.8%
9.6%

Financial Services

7.7%
12.1%

Industrials

6.7%
8.5%

Healthcare

5.5%
13.9%

Energy

2.8%
5.8%

Utilities

1.2%
2.0%

Basic Materials

1.1%
2.3%

Real Estate

0.4%
1.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

9.6%

Technology

GARP
54.7%
QARP
23.5%

Communication Services

GARP
11.4%
QARP
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

GARP
8.8%
QARP
9.6%

Financial Services

GARP
7.7%
QARP
12.1%

Industrials

GARP
6.7%
QARP
8.5%

Healthcare

GARP
5.5%
QARP
13.9%

Energy

GARP
2.8%
QARP
5.8%

Utilities

GARP
1.2%
QARP
2.0%

Basic Materials

GARP
1.1%
QARP
2.3%

Real Estate

GARP
0.4%
QARP
1.0%

Consumer Defensive

GARP

-

QARP
9.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GARP vs. QARP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GARP
GARP Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
GARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
GARP Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
GARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
GARP Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

QARP
QARP Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
QARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
QARP Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
QARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
QARP Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GARP vs. QARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) and Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GARPQARPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.43

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.32

3.46

-1.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.80

15.38

-6.59

GARP vs. QARP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GARP Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is lower than the QARP Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GARP and QARP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GARP vs. QARP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GARP drawdown since its inception was -31.34%, smaller than the maximum QARP drawdown of -35.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GARP and QARP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GARPQARPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.34%

-35.44%

+4.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.69%

-7.26%

-6.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.73%

-15.65%

-8.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.61%

-22.75%

-7.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.69%

0.00%

-3.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.29%

-4.39%

-2.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.60%

1.63%

+1.97%

Volatility

GARP vs. QARP - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) has a higher volatility of 6.26% compared to Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) at 2.76%. This indicates that GARP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QARP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GARPQARPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.26%

2.76%

+3.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.91%

8.22%

+7.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.59%

10.58%

+9.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.30%

15.54%

+6.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.94%

19.55%

+4.39%

GARP vs. QARP - Expense Ratio Comparison

GARP has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than QARP's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GARP vs. QARP - Dividend Comparison

GARP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, less than QARP's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
GARP
iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF
0.27%0.31%0.38%0.75%1.85%0.67%0.75%0.00%0.00%
QARP
Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF
1.02%1.14%1.39%1.28%1.68%1.34%1.61%1.85%1.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


GARP and QARP have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GARP has higher volatility (6.26%) compared to QARP (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GARP dropped -31.34% vs QARP's -35.44%.

On 5-year performance, GARP leads with 18.08% vs 12.09% for QARP. On fees, GARP is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QARP has been the lower-risk option at 2.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GARP has performed better with a 18.08% return vs 12.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GARP is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for QARP.

QARP has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.27% for GARP.

GARP tracks MSCI USA Quality GARP Select Index, while QARP tracks Russell 1000 2Qual/Val 5% Capped Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for GARP and 0.19% for QARP.

QARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GARP and QARP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer