GARP vs. OUSA
GARP (iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF) and OUSA (OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF) are both Quality Factor funds - GARP tracks the MSCI USA Quality GARP Select Index while OUSA tracks the O'Shares US Quality Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GARP returned 17.48%/yr vs 8.87%/yr for OUSA. Their 0.68 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. GARP charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for OUSA.
Performance
GARP vs. OUSA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GARP achieves a 16.89% return, which is significantly higher than OUSA's 6.53% return.
GARP
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- -1.22%
- 6M
- 14.45%
- YTD
- 16.89%
- 1Y
- 31.75%
- 3Y*
- 28.85%
- 5Y*
- 17.48%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 20.07%
OUSA
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 1.87%
- 6M
- 4.63%
- YTD
- 6.53%
- 1Y
- 15.60%
- 3Y*
- 12.64%
- 5Y*
- 8.87%
- 10Y*
- 10.36%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.68%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $25.65M | $25.43M | $23.00M | |
| $914.72K | $1.31M | $1.45M |
GARP vs. OUSA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GARP iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF | 16.89% | 21.49% | 37.42% | 42.86% | -26.75% | 27.99% | 26.51% |
OUSA OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF | 6.53% | 10.23% | 17.09% | 13.44% | -9.33% | 23.75% | 5.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between GARP and OUSA is 0.33, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2020 | 0.68 |
Over the past year, the correlation between GARP and OUSA has dropped to 0.33 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
GARP vs. OUSA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GARP
OUSA
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Technology
GARP
OUSA
Communication Services
GARP
OUSA
Consumer Cyclical
GARP
OUSA
Financial Services
GARP
OUSA
Industrials
GARP
OUSA
Healthcare
GARP
OUSA
Energy
GARP
OUSA
-
Utilities
GARP
OUSA
-
Basic Materials
GARP
OUSA
-
Real Estate
GARP
OUSA
-
Consumer Defensive
GARP
-
OUSA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GARP vs. OUSA — Risk / Return Rank
GARP
OUSA
GARP vs. OUSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) and OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GARP | OUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.26 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.19 | 1.78 | +0.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.99 | 6.23 | +1.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GARP vs. OUSA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GARP drawdown since its inception was -31.34%, smaller than the maximum OUSA drawdown of -33.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GARP and OUSA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GARP | OUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.34% | -33.12% | +1.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.69% | -8.36% | -5.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.73% | -13.14% | -10.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.61% | -19.54% | -11.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.34% | -0.75% | -3.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.27% | -3.50% | -3.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.75% | 2.39% | +1.36% |
Volatility
GARP vs. OUSA - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) has a higher volatility of 5.68% compared to OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA) at 4.00%. This indicates that GARP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OUSA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GARP | OUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.68% | 4.00% | +1.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.18% | 8.11% | +8.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.02% | 10.27% | +9.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.34% | 13.38% | +8.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.92% | 15.19% | +8.73% |
GARP vs. OUSA - Expense Ratio Comparison
GARP has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than OUSA's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
GARP vs. OUSA - Dividend Comparison
GARP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, less than OUSA's 1.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GARP iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF | 0.27% | 0.31% | 0.38% | 0.75% | 1.85% | 0.67% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OUSA OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF | 1.36% | 1.39% | 1.50% | 1.81% | 1.92% | 1.56% | 2.03% | 2.31% | 3.06% | 2.15% | 2.32% | 1.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GARP and OUSA have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GARP has higher volatility (5.68%) compared to OUSA (4.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GARP dropped -31.34% vs OUSA's -33.12%.
On 5-year performance, GARP leads with 17.48% vs 8.87% for OUSA. On fees, GARP is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, OUSA has been the lower-risk option at 4.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GARP has performed better with a 17.48% return vs 8.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GARP is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for OUSA.
OUSA has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 0.27% for GARP.
GARP tracks MSCI USA Quality GARP Select Index, while OUSA tracks O'Shares US Quality Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and O'Shares Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for GARP and 0.48% for OUSA.
GARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GARP and OUSA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer