GARP vs. GSC
GARP (iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF) and GSC (Goldman Sachs Small Cap Core Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GARP is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Quality GARP Select Index, while GSC is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs. GARP is passively managed, while GSC is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, GARP returned 20.74%/yr vs 21.12%/yr for GSC. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GARP charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GSC.
Performance
GARP vs. GSC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GARP achieves a 22.17% return, which is significantly higher than GSC's 15.94% return.
GARP
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 12.94%
- YTD
- 22.17%
- 6M
- 23.18%
- 1Y
- 46.14%
- 3Y*
- 33.92%
- 5Y*
- 20.74%
- 10Y*
- —
GSC
- 1D
- 1.50%
- 1M
- 4.33%
- YTD
- 15.94%
- 6M
- 16.68%
- 1Y
- 29.31%
- 3Y*
- 26.33%
- 5Y*
- 21.12%
- 10Y*
- 10.86%
GARP vs. GSC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GARP iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF | 22.17% | 21.49% | 37.42% | 42.86% | -26.75% | 27.99% | 26.51% |
GSC Goldman Sachs Small Cap Core Equity ETF | 15.94% | 6.29% | 13.79% | 33.52% | 28.40% | 58.09% | -28.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between GARP and GSC is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2020 | 0.28 |
Over the past year, GARP and GSC have become more correlated (0.61) than their long-term average of 0.28, meaning their price movements have been converging.
GARP vs. GSC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GARP
GSC
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
-
Technology
GARP
GSC
Communication Services
GARP
GSC
Financial Services
GARP
GSC
Industrials
GARP
GSC
Consumer Cyclical
GARP
GSC
Healthcare
GARP
GSC
Energy
GARP
GSC
Utilities
GARP
GSC
Basic Materials
GARP
GSC
Real Estate
GARP
GSC
Consumer Defensive
GARP
-
GSC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GARP vs. GSC — Risk / Return Rank
GARP
GSC
GARP vs. GSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) and Goldman Sachs Small Cap Core Equity ETF (GSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GARP | GSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.59 | 0.07 | +2.52 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.33 | 3.81 | -0.48 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.99 | -0.56 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.41 | 0.51 | +2.91 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.74 | 1.74 | +12.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GARP | GSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.59 | 0.07 | +2.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 | 0.10 | +0.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.07 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | -0.00 | +0.90 |
Drawdowns
GARP vs. GSC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GARP drawdown since its inception was -31.34%, smaller than the maximum GSC drawdown of -88.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GARP and GSC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GARP | GSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.34% | -88.63% | +57.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.69% | -58.25% | +44.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.73% | -58.25% | +34.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.61% | -58.25% | +27.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -66.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.01% | -31.14% | +31.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.37% | -59.28% | +51.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.40% | 16.91% | -13.51% |
Volatility
GARP vs. GSC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) is 4.87%, while Goldman Sachs Small Cap Core Equity ETF (GSC) has a volatility of 5.99%. This indicates that GARP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GARP | GSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.87% | 5.99% | -1.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.88% | 203.12% | -189.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.87% | 403.79% | -385.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.97% | 218.93% | -196.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.90% | 160.41% | -136.51% |
GARP vs. GSC - Expense Ratio Comparison
GARP has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than GSC's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
GARP vs. GSC - Dividend Comparison
GARP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%, more than GSC's 0.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GARP iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF | 0.25% | 0.31% | 0.38% | 0.75% | 1.85% | 0.67% | 0.75% |
GSC Goldman Sachs Small Cap Core Equity ETF | 0.17% | 0.16% | 0.66% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GARP and GSC have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GSC has higher volatility (5.99%) compared to GARP (4.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GARP dropped -31.34% vs GSC's -88.63%.
On 5-year performance, GSC leads with 21.12% vs 20.74% for GARP. On fees, GARP is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, GARP has been the lower-risk option at 4.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GSC has performed better with a 21.12% return vs 20.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GARP is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GSC.
GARP has the higher dividend yield at 0.25%, compared with 0.17% for GSC.
GARP is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while GSC is Small Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for GARP and 0.75% for GSC.
GARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GARP and GSC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer