GARP vs. CLOA
GARP (iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF) and CLOA (BlackRock AAA CLO ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GARP is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Quality GARP Select Index, while CLOA is a CLO fund actively managed by BlackRock. GARP is passively managed, while CLOA is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, GARP returned 31.05%/yr vs 6.62%/yr for CLOA. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GARP charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for CLOA.
Performance
GARP vs. CLOA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GARP achieves a 16.96% return, which is significantly higher than CLOA's 2.15% return.
GARP
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 3.69%
- YTD
- 16.96%
- 6M
- 17.70%
- 1Y
- 38.39%
- 3Y*
- 31.05%
- 5Y*
- 18.96%
- 10Y*
- —
CLOA
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 2.15%
- 6M
- 2.54%
- 1Y
- 5.12%
- 3Y*
- 6.62%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GARP vs. CLOA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GARP iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF | 16.96% | 21.49% | 37.42% | 38.42% |
CLOA BlackRock AAA CLO ETF | 2.15% | 5.44% | 7.25% | 8.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between GARP and CLOA is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2023 | 0.12 |
The correlation between GARP and CLOA shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (all time) to 0.25 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GARP vs. CLOA — Risk / Return Rank
GARP
CLOA
GARP vs. CLOA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) and BlackRock AAA CLO ETF (CLOA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GARP | CLOA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -11.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 3.33 | -2.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.65 | 29.15 | -26.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.37 | 145.81 | -135.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GARP vs. CLOA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GARP drawdown since its inception was -31.34%, which is greater than CLOA's maximum drawdown of -1.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GARP and CLOA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GARP | CLOA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.34% | -1.34% | -30.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.69% | -0.18% | -13.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.73% | -1.13% | -22.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.61% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.27% | 0.00% | -4.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.35% | -0.05% | -7.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.49% | 0.04% | +3.45% |
Volatility
GARP vs. CLOA - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) has a higher volatility of 7.61% compared to BlackRock AAA CLO ETF (CLOA) at 0.13%. This indicates that GARP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLOA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GARP | CLOA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.61% | 0.13% | +7.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.12% | 0.48% | +14.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.79% | 0.70% | +18.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.11% | 1.31% | +20.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.95% | 1.31% | +22.64% |
GARP vs. CLOA - Expense Ratio Comparison
GARP has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than CLOA's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GARP vs. CLOA - Dividend Comparison
GARP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, less than CLOA's 4.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLOA BlackRock AAA CLO ETF | 4.95% | 5.35% | 6.01% | 5.88% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GARP iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF | 0.26% | 0.31% | 0.38% | 0.75% | 1.85% | 0.67% | 0.75% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GARP and CLOA have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GARP has higher volatility (7.61%) compared to CLOA (0.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GARP dropped -31.34% vs CLOA's -1.34%.
On 3-year performance, GARP leads with 31.05% vs 6.62% for CLOA. On fees, GARP is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, CLOA has been the lower-risk option at 0.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, GARP has performed better with a 31.05% return vs 6.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GARP is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for CLOA.
CLOA has the higher dividend yield at 4.95%, compared with 0.26% for GARP.
GARP is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while CLOA is CLO. They also come from different issuers: iShares and BlackRock. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for GARP and 0.20% for CLOA.
CLOA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.39 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GARP and CLOA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer