GAPIX vs. MDGCX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

GAPIX (Goldman Sachs Dynamic Global Equity Fund) and MDGCX (BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc.) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, GAPIX returned 13.77%/yr vs 12.55%/yr for MDGCX. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GAPIX charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.96%/yr for MDGCX.

Performance

GAPIX vs. MDGCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Dynamic Global Equity Fund (GAPIX) and BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc. (MDGCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GAPIX achieves a 9.77% return, which is significantly lower than MDGCX's 15.18% return. Over the past 10 years, GAPIX has outperformed MDGCX with an annualized return of 13.77%, while MDGCX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.55% annualized return.

GAPIX

• 1D: -2.16%
• 1M: -0.31%
• YTD: 9.77%
• 6M: 8.76%
• 1Y: 24.94%
• 3Y*: 21.83%
• 5Y*: 11.39%
• 10Y*: 13.77%

MDGCX

• 1D: -2.21%
• 1M: -0.59%
• YTD: 15.18%
• 6M: 14.43%
• 1Y: 32.44%
• 3Y*: 20.00%
• 5Y*: 10.75%
• 10Y*: 12.55%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GAPIX vs. MDGCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GAPIX Goldman Sachs Dynamic Global Equity Fund	9.77%	21.72%	24.35%	20.67%	-18.97%	20.53%	13.61%	31.78%	-11.06%	26.49%
MDGCX BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc.	15.18%	23.61%	10.87%	22.43%	-17.94%	17.52%	15.61%	25.54%	-11.73%	23.41%

Correlation

The correlation between GAPIX and MDGCX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.98
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.97
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.98
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 1997	0.91

The correlation between GAPIX and MDGCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GAPIX vs. MDGCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GAPIX

GAPIX Risk / Return Rank: 58
GAPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
GAPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
GAPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
GAPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
GAPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 67

MDGCX

MDGCX Risk / Return Rank: 87
MDGCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
MDGCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
MDGCX Omega Ratio Rank: 81
MDGCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
MDGCX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GAPIX vs. MDGCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Dynamic Global Equity Fund (GAPIX) and BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc. (MDGCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GAPIX	MDGCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.92	2.54	-0.62
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.60	3.37	-0.76
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.46	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.63	4.24	-1.61
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.39	18.39	-6.99

GAPIX vs. MDGCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GAPIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the MDGCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GAPIX and MDGCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GAPIX vs. MDGCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GAPIX drawdown since its inception was -58.36%, which is greater than MDGCX's maximum drawdown of -48.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAPIX and MDGCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GAPIX	MDGCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.36%	-48.25%	-10.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.22%	-8.07%	-2.15%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.31%	-21.46%	+3.15%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.13%	-26.68%	-4.45%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.31%	-34.87%	-1.44%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.76%	-3.86%	+1.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.35%	-9.92%	-1.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.35%	1.86%	+0.49%

Volatility

GAPIX vs. MDGCX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Dynamic Global Equity Fund (GAPIX) and BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc. (MDGCX) have volatilities of 5.96% and 5.72%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GAPIX	MDGCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.96%	5.72%	+0.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.65%	11.21%	+0.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.07%	13.51%	+0.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.23%	16.29%	+0.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.01%	17.20%	+0.81%

GAPIX vs. MDGCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GAPIX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than MDGCX's 0.96% expense ratio.

Dividends

GAPIX vs. MDGCX - Dividend Comparison

GAPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.20%, more than MDGCX's 7.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GAPIX Goldman Sachs Dynamic Global Equity Fund	13.20%	14.49%	14.79%	5.27%	6.66%	12.60%	2.64%	10.09%	2.88%	2.33%	1.56%	1.39%
MDGCX BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc.	7.74%	8.91%	7.78%	1.42%	1.75%	16.75%	3.77%	1.73%	4.06%	34.82%	0.65%	5.18%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GAPIX and MDGCX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.98, GAPIX and MDGCX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, GAPIX or MDGCX?

GAPIX has higher volatility (5.96%) compared to MDGCX (5.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GAPIX dropped -58.36% vs MDGCX's -48.25%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MDGCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.