PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GAPAX vs. GICIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GAPAX vs. GICIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Dynamic Global Equity Fund Class A (GAPAX) and Goldman Sachs International Small Cap Insights Fund (GICIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GAPAX achieves a 12.32% return, which is significantly lower than GICIX's 14.40% return. Over the past 10 years, GAPAX has outperformed GICIX with an annualized return of 13.13%, while GICIX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.94% annualized return.


GAPAX

1D
0.39%
1M
5.12%
YTD
12.32%
6M
13.72%
1Y
30.54%
3Y*
22.69%
5Y*
11.70%
10Y*
13.13%

GICIX

1D
-0.16%
1M
4.64%
YTD
14.40%
6M
17.91%
1Y
34.09%
3Y*
23.39%
5Y*
9.70%
10Y*
9.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GAPAX vs. GICIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GAPAX
Goldman Sachs Dynamic Global Equity Fund Class A
12.32%21.27%24.08%20.25%-19.30%20.10%13.19%31.33%-11.39%25.97%
GICIX
Goldman Sachs International Small Cap Insights Fund
14.40%42.83%5.57%15.11%-18.53%13.03%7.69%21.59%-18.80%33.05%

Correlation

The correlation between GAPAX and GICIX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2008

0.86

The correlation between GAPAX and GICIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GAPAX vs. GICIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GAPAX
GAPAX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
GAPAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GAPAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
GAPAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
GAPAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
GAPAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

GICIX
GICIX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
GICIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GICIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
GICIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
GICIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
GICIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GAPAX vs. GICIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Dynamic Global Equity Fund Class A (GAPAX) and Goldman Sachs International Small Cap Insights Fund (GICIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GAPAXGICIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.42

2.20

+0.22

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.29

3.04

+0.25

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.40

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.10

2.50

+0.60

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.82

9.35

+4.47

GAPAX vs. GICIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GAPAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is comparable to the GICIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GAPAX and GICIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GAPAXGICIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.42

2.20

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

0.59

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

0.59

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.41

-0.01

Drawdowns

GAPAX vs. GICIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GAPAX drawdown since its inception was -58.88%, roughly equal to the maximum GICIX drawdown of -56.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAPAX and GICIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GAPAXGICIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.88%

-56.71%

-2.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.28%

-13.39%

+3.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.34%

-13.39%

-4.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.13%

-34.53%

+3.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.31%

-43.84%

+7.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.02%

+1.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.83%

-10.93%

-0.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.30%

3.56%

-1.26%

Volatility

GAPAX vs. GICIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Dynamic Global Equity Fund Class A (GAPAX) is 3.85%, while Goldman Sachs International Small Cap Insights Fund (GICIX) has a volatility of 4.40%. This indicates that GAPAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GICIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GAPAXGICIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.85%

4.40%

-0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.39%

12.68%

-2.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.12%

15.28%

-2.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.04%

16.54%

+0.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.00%

16.80%

+1.20%

GAPAX vs. GICIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GAPAX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than GICIX's 0.87% expense ratio.


Dividends

GAPAX vs. GICIX - Dividend Comparison

GAPAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.86%, more than GICIX's 7.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GAPAX
Goldman Sachs Dynamic Global Equity Fund Class A
12.86%14.45%14.69%5.01%6.35%12.40%2.34%9.86%2.64%1.96%1.16%0.97%
GICIX
Goldman Sachs International Small Cap Insights Fund
7.07%8.08%4.77%3.04%3.10%3.39%1.87%3.47%1.68%8.29%2.79%1.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


GAPAX and GICIX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GICIX has higher volatility (4.40%) compared to GAPAX (3.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GAPAX dropped -58.88% vs GICIX's -56.71%.

GAPAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GAPAX and GICIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer