GAME vs. ESPO
GAME (GameSquare Holdings Inc.) is a stock, while ESPO (VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF) is Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MVIS Global Video Gaming and eSports Index. Over the past 5 years, GAME returned -59.01%/yr vs 6.23%/yr for ESPO. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GAME vs. ESPO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GAME achieves a 7.25% return, which is significantly higher than ESPO's -13.31% return.
GAME
- 1D
- -4.84%
- 1M
- -12.15%
- YTD
- 7.25%
- 6M
- -15.46%
- 1Y
- -53.92%
- 3Y*
- -53.05%
- 5Y*
- -59.01%
- 10Y*
- —
ESPO
- 1D
- -2.20%
- 1M
- -1.23%
- YTD
- -13.31%
- 6M
- -16.99%
- 1Y
- -11.55%
- 3Y*
- 19.46%
- 5Y*
- 6.23%
- 10Y*
- —
GAME vs. ESPO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAME GameSquare Holdings Inc. | 7.25% | -53.34% | -54.41% | -53.83% | -67.76% | -63.01% | -35.49% | 1,951.21% | -43.98% |
ESPO VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF | -13.31% | 25.79% | 47.61% | 33.64% | -34.71% | -2.13% | 83.93% | 42.36% | -12.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between GAME and ESPO is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2018 | 0.15 |
The correlation between GAME and ESPO shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (all time) to 0.33 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GAME vs. ESPO — Risk / Return Rank
GAME
ESPO
GAME vs. ESPO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GameSquare Holdings Inc. (GAME) and VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GAME | ESPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.39 | -0.62 | +0.22 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.08 | -0.75 | +0.83 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 0.91 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.60 | -0.42 | -0.19 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.75 | -0.76 | +0.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GAME | ESPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.39 | -0.62 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.50 | 0.25 | -0.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.10 | 0.63 | -0.73 |
Drawdowns
GAME vs. ESPO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GAME drawdown since its inception was -99.89%, which is greater than ESPO's maximum drawdown of -50.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAME and ESPO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GAME | ESPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.89% | -50.99% | -48.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -89.36% | -27.81% | -61.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -94.19% | -27.81% | -66.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.53% | -48.33% | -51.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.82% | -25.66% | -74.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -89.10% | -15.03% | -74.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 72.11% | 15.30% | +56.81% |
Volatility
GAME vs. ESPO - Volatility Comparison
GameSquare Holdings Inc. (GAME) has a higher volatility of 33.26% compared to VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) at 5.00%. This indicates that GAME's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESPO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GAME | ESPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 33.26% | 5.00% | +28.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 72.53% | 14.58% | +57.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 137.02% | 18.85% | +118.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 118.78% | 25.12% | +93.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 452.01% | 25.75% | +426.26% |
Dividends
GAME vs. ESPO - Dividend Comparison
GAME has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ESPO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESPO VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF | 1.44% | 1.24% | 0.44% | 0.96% | 0.91% | 3.36% | 0.12% | 0.22% | 0.04% |
GAME GameSquare Holdings Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GAME and ESPO have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GAME has higher volatility (33.26%) compared to ESPO (5.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GAME dropped -99.89% vs ESPO's -50.99%.
GAME currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.39 vs -0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GAME and ESPO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer