GAL vs. THRV
GAL (SPDR SSgA Global Allocation ETF) and THRV (Prospera Income ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GAL charges 0.35%/yr vs 1.80%/yr for THRV.
Performance
GAL vs. THRV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GAL achieves a 8.72% return, which is significantly higher than THRV's 1.86% return.
GAL
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- 2.59%
- YTD
- 8.72%
- 6M
- 9.29%
- 1Y
- 20.19%
- 3Y*
- 14.04%
- 5Y*
- 6.96%
- 10Y*
- 8.23%
THRV
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- YTD
- 1.86%
- 6M
- 1.66%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GAL vs. THRV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GAL SPDR SSgA Global Allocation ETF | 8.72% | 2.35% |
THRV Prospera Income ETF | 1.86% | 0.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between GAL and THRV is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025 | 0.71 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GAL vs. THRV — Risk / Return Rank
GAL
THRV
GAL vs. THRV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR SSgA Global Allocation ETF (GAL) and Prospera Income ETF (THRV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GAL | THRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.24 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.83 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GAL | THRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.32 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 1.04 | -0.35 |
Drawdowns
GAL vs. THRV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GAL drawdown since its inception was -28.31%, which is greater than THRV's maximum drawdown of -1.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAL and THRV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GAL | THRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.31% | -1.50% | -26.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.27% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.12% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.57% | -0.51% | -0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.74% | -0.44% | -3.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.46% | — | — |
Volatility
GAL vs. THRV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GAL | THRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.66% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.01% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.73% | 2.92% | +5.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.43% | 2.92% | +7.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.37% | 2.92% | +8.45% |
GAL vs. THRV - Expense Ratio Comparison
GAL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than THRV's 1.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
GAL vs. THRV - Dividend Comparison
GAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%, less than THRV's 4.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAL SPDR SSgA Global Allocation ETF | 3.13% | 3.47% | 2.99% | 2.56% | 6.19% | 4.05% | 2.14% | 2.96% | 2.43% | 2.26% | 2.43% | 3.10% |
THRV Prospera Income ETF | 4.71% | 1.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GAL and THRV have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GAL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GAL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.80% for THRV.
THRV has the higher dividend yield at 4.71%, compared with 3.13% for GAL.
They also come from different issuers: State Street and Prospera Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for GAL and 1.80% for THRV.
Find the right allocation for GAL and THRV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer