PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GAL vs. SPYD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GAL vs. SPYD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR SSgA Global Allocation ETF (GAL) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF (SPYD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GAL achieves a 8.72% return, which is significantly lower than SPYD's 10.34% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GAL having a 8.23% annualized return and SPYD not far ahead at 8.59%.


GAL

1D
-0.57%
1M
2.59%
YTD
8.72%
6M
9.29%
1Y
20.19%
3Y*
14.04%
5Y*
6.96%
10Y*
8.23%

SPYD

1D
-0.44%
1M
1.57%
YTD
10.34%
6M
10.97%
1Y
16.38%
3Y*
14.37%
5Y*
6.76%
10Y*
8.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GAL vs. SPYD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GAL
SPDR SSgA Global Allocation ETF
8.72%15.95%9.85%13.32%-13.41%12.23%9.33%19.59%-7.71%18.67%
SPYD
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF
10.34%4.65%15.34%3.91%-1.17%32.73%-11.64%21.20%-4.89%12.67%

Correlation

The correlation between GAL and SPYD is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2015

0.67

Over the past year, the correlation between GAL and SPYD has dropped to 0.47 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

GAL vs. SPYD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GAL
SPYD

Technology

27.2%
2.7%

Financial Services

15.8%
12.1%

Industrials

12.2%
2.3%

Consumer Cyclical

9.9%
6.5%

Healthcare

7.8%
5.2%

Communication Services

7.7%
5.1%

Basic Materials

5.0%
3.4%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
16.3%

Energy

4.3%
9.2%

Real Estate

2.7%
25.8%

Utilities

2.6%
11.4%

Technology

GAL
27.2%
SPYD
2.7%

Financial Services

GAL
15.8%
SPYD
12.1%

Industrials

GAL
12.2%
SPYD
2.3%

Consumer Cyclical

GAL
9.9%
SPYD
6.5%

Healthcare

GAL
7.8%
SPYD
5.2%

Communication Services

GAL
7.7%
SPYD
5.1%

Basic Materials

GAL
5.0%
SPYD
3.4%

Consumer Defensive

GAL
4.8%
SPYD
16.3%

Energy

GAL
4.3%
SPYD
9.2%

Real Estate

GAL
2.7%
SPYD
25.8%

Utilities

GAL
2.6%
SPYD
11.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GAL vs. SPYD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GAL
GAL Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
GAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
GAL Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
GAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
GAL Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYD
SPYD Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
SPYD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYD Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYD Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GAL vs. SPYD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR SSgA Global Allocation ETF (GAL) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF (SPYD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GALSPYDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.24

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.24

2.33

+0.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.83

6.77

+7.05

GAL vs. SPYD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GAL Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is higher than the SPYD Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GAL and SPYD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GALSPYDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.32

1.42

+0.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

0.42

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

0.44

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.47

+0.23

Drawdowns

GAL vs. SPYD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GAL drawdown since its inception was -28.31%, smaller than the maximum SPYD drawdown of -46.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAL and SPYD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GALSPYDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.31%

-46.42%

+18.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.27%

-7.05%

+0.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.12%

-16.13%

+7.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.14%

-22.25%

+1.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.31%

-46.42%

+18.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.57%

-1.11%

+0.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.74%

-6.17%

+2.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.46%

2.43%

-0.97%

Volatility

GAL vs. SPYD - Volatility Comparison

SPDR SSgA Global Allocation ETF (GAL) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF (SPYD) have volatilities of 2.66% and 2.57%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GALSPYDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.66%

2.57%

+0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.01%

7.71%

-0.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.73%

11.62%

-2.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.43%

16.13%

-5.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.37%

19.78%

-8.41%

GAL vs. SPYD - Expense Ratio Comparison

GAL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYD's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

GAL vs. SPYD - Dividend Comparison

GAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%, less than SPYD's 4.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GAL
SPDR SSgA Global Allocation ETF
3.13%3.47%2.99%2.56%6.19%4.05%2.14%2.96%2.43%2.26%2.43%3.10%
SPYD
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF
4.21%4.52%4.31%4.66%5.01%3.68%4.95%4.42%4.75%4.63%4.34%1.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


GAL and SPYD have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GAL has higher volatility (2.66%) compared to SPYD (2.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GAL dropped -28.31% vs SPYD's -46.42%.

On 10-year performance, SPYD leads with 8.59% vs 8.23% for GAL. On fees, SPYD is cheaper at 0.07% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPYD has performed better with a 8.59% return vs 8.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYD is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for GAL.

SPYD has the higher dividend yield at 4.21%, compared with 3.13% for GAL.

GAL is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while SPYD is S&P 500. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for GAL and 0.07% for SPYD.

GAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GAL and SPYD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer