PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GAL vs. SPY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GAL vs. SPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR SSgA Global Allocation ETF (GAL) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GAL achieves a 8.72% return, which is significantly lower than SPY's 10.91% return. Over the past 10 years, GAL has underperformed SPY with an annualized return of 8.23%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively higher 15.49% annualized return.


GAL

1D
-0.57%
1M
2.59%
YTD
8.72%
6M
9.29%
1Y
20.19%
3Y*
14.04%
5Y*
6.96%
10Y*
8.23%

SPY

1D
-0.70%
1M
5.05%
YTD
10.91%
6M
10.91%
1Y
27.98%
3Y*
22.35%
5Y*
13.83%
10Y*
15.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GAL vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GAL
SPDR SSgA Global Allocation ETF
8.72%15.95%9.85%13.32%-13.41%12.23%9.33%19.59%-7.71%18.67%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
10.91%17.72%24.89%26.18%-18.18%28.73%18.33%31.22%-4.57%21.71%

Correlation

The correlation between GAL and SPY is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2012

0.85

The correlation between GAL and SPY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

GAL vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GAL
SPY

Technology

27.2%
35.9%

Financial Services

15.8%
11.8%

Industrials

12.2%
7.8%

Consumer Cyclical

9.9%
10.3%

Healthcare

7.8%
8.4%

Communication Services

7.7%
11.3%

Basic Materials

5.0%
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
4.8%

Energy

4.3%
3.6%

Real Estate

2.7%
1.9%

Utilities

2.6%
2.4%

Technology

GAL
27.2%
SPY
35.9%

Financial Services

GAL
15.8%
SPY
11.8%

Industrials

GAL
12.2%
SPY
7.8%

Consumer Cyclical

GAL
9.9%
SPY
10.3%

Healthcare

GAL
7.8%
SPY
8.4%

Communication Services

GAL
7.7%
SPY
11.3%

Basic Materials

GAL
5.0%
SPY
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

GAL
4.8%
SPY
4.8%

Energy

GAL
4.3%
SPY
3.6%

Real Estate

GAL
2.7%
SPY
1.9%

Utilities

GAL
2.6%
SPY
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GAL vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GAL
GAL Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
GAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
GAL Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
GAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
GAL Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

SPY
SPY Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPY Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPY Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GAL vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR SSgA Global Allocation ETF (GAL) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GALSPYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.43

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.24

3.16

+0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.83

14.72

-0.89

GAL vs. SPY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GAL Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is comparable to the SPY Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GAL and SPY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GALSPYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.32

2.38

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

0.82

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

0.87

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.59

+0.11

Drawdowns

GAL vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GAL drawdown since its inception was -28.31%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAL and SPY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GALSPYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.31%

-55.19%

+26.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.27%

-8.88%

+2.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.12%

-18.76%

+9.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.14%

-24.50%

+3.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.31%

-33.72%

+5.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.57%

-0.70%

+0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.74%

-9.05%

+5.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.46%

1.91%

-0.45%

Volatility

GAL vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR SSgA Global Allocation ETF (GAL) is 2.66%, while State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) has a volatility of 2.84%. This indicates that GAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GALSPYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.66%

2.84%

-0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.01%

8.90%

-1.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.73%

11.83%

-3.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.43%

17.05%

-6.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.37%

17.94%

-6.57%

GAL vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison

GAL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

GAL vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison

GAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%, more than SPY's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GAL
SPDR SSgA Global Allocation ETF
3.13%3.47%2.99%2.56%6.19%4.05%2.14%2.96%2.43%2.26%2.43%3.10%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
0.98%1.07%1.21%1.40%1.65%1.20%1.52%1.75%2.04%1.80%2.03%2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, GAL and SPY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SPY has higher volatility (2.84%) compared to GAL (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GAL dropped -28.31% vs SPY's -55.19%.

On 10-year performance, SPY leads with 15.49% vs 8.23% for GAL. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, GAL has been the lower-risk option at 2.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPY has performed better with a 15.49% return vs 8.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for GAL.

GAL has the higher dividend yield at 3.13%, compared with 0.98% for SPY.

GAL is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while SPY is S&P 500. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for GAL and 0.09% for SPY.

SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GAL and SPY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer