GAL vs. GLDM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GAL (SPDR SSgA Global Allocation ETF) and GLDM (SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - GAL is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by State Street, while GLDM is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM. GAL is actively managed, while GLDM is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GAL returned 6.96%/yr vs 18.49%/yr for GLDM. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GAL charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for GLDM.

Performance

GAL vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR SSgA Global Allocation ETF (GAL) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GAL achieves a 8.72% return, which is significantly higher than GLDM's 3.00% return.

GAL

• 1D: -0.57%
• 1M: 2.59%
• YTD: 8.72%
• 6M: 9.29%
• 1Y: 20.19%
• 3Y*: 14.04%
• 5Y*: 6.96%
• 10Y*: 8.23%

GLDM

• 1D: -0.96%
• 1M: -1.62%
• YTD: 3.00%
• 6M: 5.60%
• 1Y: 32.42%
• 3Y*: 31.49%
• 5Y*: 18.49%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GAL vs. GLDM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
GAL SPDR SSgA Global Allocation ETF	8.72%	15.95%	9.85%	13.32%	-13.41%	12.23%	9.33%	19.59%	-7.26%
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust	3.00%	64.20%	27.08%	13.04%	-0.47%	-4.01%	25.10%	18.10%	1.84%

Correlation

The correlation between GAL and GLDM is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.33
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2018	0.25

The correlation between GAL and GLDM shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (all time) to 0.36 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GAL vs. GLDM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GAL	GLDM
Technology	27.2%	-
Financial Services	15.8%	-
Industrials	12.2%	-
Consumer Cyclical	9.9%	-
Healthcare	7.8%	-
Communication Services	7.7%	-
Basic Materials	5.0%	100.0%
Consumer Defensive	4.8%	-
Energy	4.3%	-
Real Estate	2.7%	-
Utilities	2.6%	-

Return for Risk

GAL vs. GLDM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GAL

GAL Risk / Return Rank: 70
GAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
GAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
GAL Omega Ratio Rank: 71
GAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
GAL Martin Ratio Rank: 73

GLDM

GLDM Risk / Return Rank: 32
GLDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
GLDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
GLDM Omega Ratio Rank: 36
GLDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
GLDM Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GAL vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR SSgA Global Allocation ETF (GAL) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GAL	GLDM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.32	1.24	+1.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.29	1.63	+1.66
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.25	+0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.24	1.70	+1.53
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.83	4.23	+9.60
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GAL vs. GLDM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GAL Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is higher than the GLDM Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GAL and GLDM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GAL	GLDM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.32	1.24	+1.09
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67	1.04	-0.37
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.73	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.69	1.02	-0.32

Drawdowns

GAL vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GAL drawdown since its inception was -28.31%, which is greater than GLDM's maximum drawdown of -21.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAL and GLDM.

Drawdown Indicators

	GAL	GLDM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.31%	-21.63%	-6.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.27%	-19.14%	+12.87%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.12%	-19.14%	+10.02%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.14%	-20.92%	-0.22%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-28.31%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.57%	-17.65%	+17.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.74%	-6.22%	+2.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.46%	7.69%	-6.23%

Volatility

GAL vs. GLDM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR SSgA Global Allocation ETF (GAL) is 2.66%, while SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) has a volatility of 5.47%. This indicates that GAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GAL	GLDM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.66%	5.47%	-2.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.01%	22.99%	-15.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.73%	26.39%	-17.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.43%	17.91%	-7.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.37%	16.85%	-5.48%

GAL vs. GLDM - Expense Ratio Comparison

GAL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDM's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

GAL vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison

GAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%, while GLDM has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GAL SPDR SSgA Global Allocation ETF	3.13%	3.47%	2.99%	2.56%	6.19%	4.05%	2.14%	2.96%	2.43%	2.26%	2.43%	3.10%
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GAL and GLDM in my portfolio?

GAL and GLDM have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GAL or GLDM?

GLDM has higher volatility (5.47%) compared to GAL (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GAL dropped -28.31% vs GLDM's -21.63%.

Which ETF is better, GAL or GLDM?

On 5-year performance, GLDM leads with 18.49% vs 6.96% for GAL. On fees, GLDM is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, GAL has been the lower-risk option at 2.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GAL or GLDM?

Over the 5-year period, GLDM has performed better with a 18.49% return vs 6.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GAL or GLDM?

GLDM is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for GAL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GAL or GLDM?

GAL has the higher dividend yield at 3.13%, compared with 0.00% for GLDM.

What is the main difference between GAL and GLDM?

GAL is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while GLDM is Gold. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for GAL and 0.10% for GLDM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.