GAIFX vs. ANWPX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

GAIFX (American Funds Growth and Income Portfolio Class F-1) and ANWPX (American Funds New Perspective Fund Class A) are both mutual funds - GAIFX is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by American Funds, while ANWPX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by American Funds. Over the past 10 years, GAIFX returned 10.82%/yr vs 13.41%/yr for ANWPX. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. GAIFX charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.72%/yr for ANWPX.

Performance

GAIFX vs. ANWPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Growth and Income Portfolio Class F-1 (GAIFX) and American Funds New Perspective Fund Class A (ANWPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GAIFX achieves a 8.63% return, which is significantly higher than ANWPX's 6.76% return. Over the past 10 years, GAIFX has underperformed ANWPX with an annualized return of 10.82%, while ANWPX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.41% annualized return.

GAIFX

• 1D: -0.52%
• 1M: 2.81%
• YTD: 8.63%
• 6M: 9.03%
• 1Y: 21.05%
• 3Y*: 17.50%
• 5Y*: 9.22%
• 10Y*: 10.82%

ANWPX

• 1D: -0.58%
• 1M: 4.09%
• YTD: 6.76%
• 6M: 7.66%
• 1Y: 19.20%
• 3Y*: 18.40%
• 5Y*: 8.60%
• 10Y*: 13.41%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GAIFX vs. ANWPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GAIFX American Funds Growth and Income Portfolio Class F-1	8.63%	18.16%	14.55%	18.71%	-15.97%	16.33%	16.31%	21.86%	-5.94%	19.08%
ANWPX American Funds New Perspective Fund Class A	6.76%	21.33%	16.76%	24.63%	-25.92%	17.64%	33.42%	30.10%	-5.99%	28.91%

Correlation

The correlation between GAIFX and ANWPX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2012	0.95

The correlation between GAIFX and ANWPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GAIFX vs. ANWPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GAIFX

GAIFX Risk / Return Rank: 57
GAIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
GAIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
GAIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 56
GAIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
GAIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 63

ANWPX

ANWPX Risk / Return Rank: 27
ANWPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
ANWPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
ANWPX Omega Ratio Rank: 27
ANWPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
ANWPX Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GAIFX vs. ANWPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Growth and Income Portfolio Class F-1 (GAIFX) and American Funds New Perspective Fund Class A (ANWPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GAIFX	ANWPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.15	1.49	+0.66
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.06	2.14	+0.92
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.27	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.66	1.73	+0.92
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.00	7.31	+4.70
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GAIFX vs. ANWPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GAIFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is higher than the ANWPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GAIFX and ANWPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GAIFX	ANWPX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.15	1.49	+0.66
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.74	0.50	+0.23
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.82	0.75	+0.07
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.87	0.67	+0.20

Drawdowns

GAIFX vs. ANWPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GAIFX drawdown since its inception was -26.55%, smaller than the maximum ANWPX drawdown of -52.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAIFX and ANWPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GAIFX	ANWPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.55%	-52.34%	+25.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.13%	-11.48%	+3.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.83%	-17.93%	+5.10%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.14%	-34.45%	+11.31%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-26.55%	-34.45%	+7.90%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.52%	-0.58%	+0.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.44%	-8.11%	+4.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.80%	2.72%	-0.92%

Volatility

GAIFX vs. ANWPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Funds Growth and Income Portfolio Class F-1 (GAIFX) is 3.08%, while American Funds New Perspective Fund Class A (ANWPX) has a volatility of 3.98%. This indicates that GAIFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ANWPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GAIFX	ANWPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.08%	3.98%	-0.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.01%	10.77%	-2.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.06%	13.39%	-3.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.58%	17.20%	-4.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.17%	17.83%	-4.66%

GAIFX vs. ANWPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GAIFX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than ANWPX's 0.72% expense ratio.

Dividends

GAIFX vs. ANWPX - Dividend Comparison

GAIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.22%, less than ANWPX's 6.16% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ANWPX American Funds New Perspective Fund Class A	6.16%	6.57%	5.13%	5.36%	4.16%	7.01%	4.13%	3.67%	7.59%	5.50%	3.86%	6.14%
GAIFX American Funds Growth and Income Portfolio Class F-1	5.22%	5.73%	4.77%	2.77%	6.40%	5.09%	3.97%	5.49%	6.06%	3.41%	4.34%	4.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GAIFX and ANWPX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, GAIFX and ANWPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, GAIFX or ANWPX?

ANWPX has higher volatility (3.98%) compared to GAIFX (3.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GAIFX dropped -26.55% vs ANWPX's -52.34%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GAIFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.