GAID vs. XUDV

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

GAID (Guinness Atkinson International Dividend Builder ETF) and XUDV (Franklin U.S. Dividend Booster Index ETF) are both Dividend funds. GAID is actively managed, while XUDV is passively managed. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GAID charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for XUDV.

Performance

GAID vs. XUDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Guinness Atkinson International Dividend Builder ETF (GAID) and Franklin U.S. Dividend Booster Index ETF (XUDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GAID achieves a -1.34% return, which is significantly lower than XUDV's 24.72% return.

GAID

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -1.00%
• 6M: -3.30%
• YTD: -1.34%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XUDV

• 1D: -0.25%
• 1M: 4.35%
• 6M: 18.87%
• YTD: 24.72%
• 1Y: 29.44%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GAID vs. XUDV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GAID Guinness Atkinson International Dividend Builder ETF	-1.34%	0.04%
XUDV Franklin U.S. Dividend Booster Index ETF	24.72%	-0.89%

Correlation

The correlation between GAID and XUDV is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2025	0.40

Return for Risk

GAID vs. XUDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GAID

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XUDV

XUDV Risk / Return Rank: 90
XUDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
XUDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
XUDV Omega Ratio Rank: 86
XUDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
XUDV Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GAID vs. XUDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guinness Atkinson International Dividend Builder ETF (GAID) and Franklin U.S. Dividend Booster Index ETF (XUDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GAID	XUDV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.40	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.38	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.41	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	4.67	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	15.64	—

Drawdowns

GAID vs. XUDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GAID drawdown since its inception was -13.61%, smaller than the maximum XUDV drawdown of -15.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAID and XUDV.

Drawdown Indicators

	GAID	XUDV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.61%	-15.98%	+2.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-6.34%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.22%	-0.25%	-3.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.42%	-2.00%	-2.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.89%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GAID	XUDV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.64%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	8.67%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.51%	12.31%	+3.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.51%	16.07%	-0.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.51%	16.07%	-0.56%

GAID vs. XUDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

GAID has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than XUDV's 0.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

GAID vs. XUDV - Dividend Comparison

GAID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than XUDV's 3.34% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
GAID Guinness Atkinson International Dividend Builder ETF	0.65%	0.00%
XUDV Franklin U.S. Dividend Booster Index ETF	3.34%	3.80%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GAID and XUDV in my portfolio?

GAID and XUDV have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GAID or XUDV?

On fees, XUDV is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GAID or XUDV?

XUDV is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for GAID.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GAID or XUDV?

XUDV has the higher dividend yield at 3.34%, compared with 0.65% for GAID.

What is the main difference between GAID and XUDV?

They also come from different issuers: Guinness Atkinson and Franklin. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for GAID and 0.09% for XUDV.