GABVX vs. GPIQ
GABVX (Gabelli Value 25 Fund) and GPIQ (Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF) are both funds - GABVX is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Gabelli, while GPIQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs. Over the past year, GABVX returned 27.72% vs 38.62% for GPIQ. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GABVX charges 1.43%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for GPIQ.
Performance
GABVX vs. GPIQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GABVX achieves a 7.99% return, which is significantly lower than GPIQ's 18.52% return.
GABVX
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 1.30%
- YTD
- 7.99%
- 6M
- 12.41%
- 1Y
- 27.72%
- 3Y*
- 15.55%
- 5Y*
- 5.11%
- 10Y*
- 7.38%
GPIQ
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 8.59%
- YTD
- 18.52%
- 6M
- 18.10%
- 1Y
- 38.62%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GABVX vs. GPIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GABVX Gabelli Value 25 Fund | 7.99% | 28.77% | 4.10% | 14.09% |
GPIQ Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF | 18.52% | 19.77% | 23.22% | 15.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between GABVX and GPIQ is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2023 | 0.52 |
The correlation between GABVX and GPIQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GABVX vs. GPIQ — Risk / Return Rank
GABVX
GPIQ
GABVX vs. GPIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gabelli Value 25 Fund (GABVX) and Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GABVX | GPIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.32 | 2.90 | -0.58 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.25 | 3.81 | -0.55 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.52 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.14 | 4.15 | -1.01 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.91 | 18.37 | -5.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GABVX | GPIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.32 | 2.90 | -0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 1.79 | -1.27 |
Drawdowns
GABVX vs. GPIQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GABVX drawdown since its inception was -63.09%, which is greater than GPIQ's maximum drawdown of -21.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GABVX and GPIQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GABVX | GPIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.09% | -21.06% | -42.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.10% | -9.51% | +0.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.17% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.99% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.80% | 0.00% | -0.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.50% | -2.27% | -6.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.21% | 2.15% | +0.06% |
Volatility
GABVX vs. GPIQ - Volatility Comparison
Gabelli Value 25 Fund (GABVX) and Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) have volatilities of 3.40% and 3.38%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GABVX | GPIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.40% | 3.38% | +0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.50% | 10.45% | -0.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.39% | 13.40% | -1.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.25% | 17.48% | -1.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.55% | 17.48% | +0.07% |
GABVX vs. GPIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
GABVX has a 1.43% expense ratio, which is higher than GPIQ's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
GABVX vs. GPIQ - Dividend Comparison
GABVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.20%, more than GPIQ's 9.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GABVX Gabelli Value 25 Fund | 10.20% | 11.01% | 0.00% | 12.15% | 17.78% | 12.01% | 9.32% | 10.28% | 9.54% | 6.82% | 7.49% | 17.39% |
GPIQ Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF | 9.31% | 9.81% | 9.18% | 1.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GABVX and GPIQ have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GABVX has higher volatility (3.40%) compared to GPIQ (3.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GABVX dropped -63.09% vs GPIQ's -21.06%.
GPIQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.90 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GABVX and GPIQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer