PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GABVX vs. FNKFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GABVX vs. FNKFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gabelli Value 25 Fund (GABVX) and Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock K6 Fund (FNKFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GABVX achieves a 10.34% return, which is significantly lower than FNKFX's 14.57% return.


GABVX

1D
0.71%
1M
-0.16%
6M
6.45%
YTD
10.34%
1Y
26.17%
3Y*
14.00%
5Y*
6.11%
10Y*
7.33%
ALL TIME*
9.24%

FNKFX

1D
1.21%
1M
-2.53%
6M
10.75%
YTD
14.57%
1Y
22.72%
3Y*
16.72%
5Y*
11.74%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

GABVX vs. FNKFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
GABVX
Gabelli Value 25 Fund
10.34%28.77%4.10%8.75%-15.87%14.86%5.86%3.75%
FNKFX
Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock K6 Fund
14.57%11.07%21.99%11.55%-5.98%27.16%11.27%8.97%

Correlation

The correlation between GABVX and FNKFX is 0.69, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2019

0.86

The correlation between GABVX and FNKFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.86 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GABVX vs. FNKFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GABVX
GABVX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
GABVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GABVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
GABVX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
GABVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
GABVX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

FNKFX
FNKFX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
FNKFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNKFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNKFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
FNKFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNKFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GABVX vs. FNKFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gabelli Value 25 Fund (GABVX) and Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock K6 Fund (FNKFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GABVXFNKFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.22

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.66

2.36

+0.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.89

8.49

+2.40

GABVX vs. FNKFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GABVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is higher than the FNKFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GABVX and FNKFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GABVX vs. FNKFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GABVX drawdown since its inception was -63.09%, which is greater than FNKFX's maximum drawdown of -41.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GABVX and FNKFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GABVXFNKFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.09%

-41.25%

-21.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.10%

-8.67%

-0.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.17%

-21.86%

+3.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.39%

-21.86%

-4.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.16%

-4.37%

+4.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.47%

-4.91%

-3.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.22%

2.41%

-0.19%

Volatility

GABVX vs. FNKFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Gabelli Value 25 Fund (GABVX) is 3.10%, while Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock K6 Fund (FNKFX) has a volatility of 4.16%. This indicates that GABVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNKFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GABVXFNKFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.10%

4.16%

-1.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.73%

13.23%

-3.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.51%

16.77%

-4.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.20%

18.86%

-2.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.46%

21.87%

-4.41%

GABVX vs. FNKFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GABVX has a 1.43% expense ratio, which is higher than FNKFX's 0.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

GABVX vs. FNKFX - Dividend Comparison

GABVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.98%, more than FNKFX's 4.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNKFX
Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock K6 Fund
4.00%0.59%12.35%0.99%2.91%4.03%1.45%0.52%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GABVX
Gabelli Value 25 Fund
9.98%11.01%0.00%12.15%17.78%12.01%9.32%10.28%9.54%6.82%7.49%17.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


GABVX and FNKFX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FNKFX has higher volatility (4.16%) compared to GABVX (3.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GABVX dropped -63.09% vs FNKFX's -41.25%.

GABVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GABVX and FNKFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer