GABFX vs. GQEFX
GABFX (GMO Asset Allocation Bond Fund) and GQEFX (GMO Quality Fund Class IV) are both mutual funds - GABFX is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund managed by GMO, while GQEFX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by GMO. Over the past 5 years, GABFX returned -3.20%/yr vs 12.48%/yr for GQEFX. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GABFX charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for GQEFX.
Performance
GABFX vs. GQEFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GABFX achieves a -3.48% return, which is significantly lower than GQEFX's 3.22% return.
GABFX
- 1D
- 1.18%
- 1M
- 1.12%
- YTD
- -3.48%
- 6M
- -3.69%
- 1Y
- -0.23%
- 3Y*
- -1.26%
- 5Y*
- -3.20%
- 10Y*
- 0.51%
GQEFX
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- -1.89%
- YTD
- 3.22%
- 6M
- 2.57%
- 1Y
- 17.15%
- 3Y*
- 16.17%
- 5Y*
- 12.48%
- 10Y*
- —
GABFX vs. GQEFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GABFX GMO Asset Allocation Bond Fund | -3.48% | 8.82% | -12.60% | 8.33% | -14.86% | 1.34% | 11.28% | 8.00% | 0.78% | 0.89% |
GQEFX GMO Quality Fund Class IV | 3.22% | 19.64% | 17.54% | 28.95% | -15.30% | 31.76% | 18.39% | 31.87% | 0.54% | 10.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between GABFX and GQEFX is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2017 | 0.04 |
Over the past year, GABFX and GQEFX have become more correlated (0.26) than their long-term average of 0.04, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GABFX vs. GQEFX — Risk / Return Rank
GABFX
GQEFX
GABFX vs. GQEFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Asset Allocation Bond Fund (GABFX) and GMO Quality Fund Class IV (GQEFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GABFX | GQEFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.23 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.02 | 1.32 | -1.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.06 | 5.22 | -5.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GABFX vs. GQEFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GABFX drawdown since its inception was -27.84%, smaller than the maximum GQEFX drawdown of -30.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GABFX and GQEFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GABFX | GQEFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.84% | -30.42% | +2.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.58% | -12.74% | +3.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.48% | -15.55% | -3.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.84% | -24.22% | -3.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.38% | -2.74% | -14.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.34% | -4.15% | -3.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.97% | 3.23% | +0.74% |
Volatility
GABFX vs. GQEFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GMO Asset Allocation Bond Fund (GABFX) is 2.57%, while GMO Quality Fund Class IV (GQEFX) has a volatility of 4.23%. This indicates that GABFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GQEFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GABFX | GQEFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.57% | 4.23% | -1.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.68% | 10.07% | -3.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.23% | 12.64% | -2.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.04% | 15.94% | -1.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.37% | 17.75% | -7.38% |
GABFX vs. GQEFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GABFX has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than GQEFX's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
GABFX vs. GQEFX - Dividend Comparison
GABFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, less than GQEFX's 10.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GABFX GMO Asset Allocation Bond Fund | 2.79% | 2.69% | 4.19% | 5.03% | 0.71% | 1.81% | 1.20% | 4.72% | 5.13% | 1.07% | 0.00% | 7.43% |
GQEFX GMO Quality Fund Class IV | 10.80% | 11.15% | 3.70% | 3.43% | 11.84% | 10.23% | 13.62% | 8.09% | 21.69% | 7.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GABFX and GQEFX have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GQEFX has higher volatility (4.23%) compared to GABFX (2.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GABFX dropped -27.84% vs GQEFX's -30.42%.
GQEFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GABFX and GQEFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer