GABFX vs. GMGEX
GABFX (GMO Asset Allocation Bond Fund) and GMGEX (GMO Global Equity Allocation Fund) are both mutual funds - GABFX is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund managed by GMO, while GMGEX is a Global Equities fund managed by GMO. Over the past 10 years, GABFX returned 0.36%/yr vs 11.70%/yr for GMGEX. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GABFX charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for GMGEX.
Performance
GABFX vs. GMGEX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GABFX achieves a -4.93% return, which is significantly lower than GMGEX's 18.76% return. Over the past 10 years, GABFX has underperformed GMGEX with an annualized return of 0.36%, while GMGEX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.70% annualized return.
GABFX
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- 0.74%
- YTD
- -4.93%
- 6M
- -4.57%
- 1Y
- -1.30%
- 3Y*
- -1.75%
- 5Y*
- -3.54%
- 10Y*
- 0.36%
GMGEX
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 1.60%
- YTD
- 18.76%
- 6M
- 18.21%
- 1Y
- 40.11%
- 3Y*
- 21.14%
- 5Y*
- 10.37%
- 10Y*
- 11.70%
GABFX vs. GMGEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GABFX GMO Asset Allocation Bond Fund | -4.93% | 8.82% | -12.60% | 8.33% | -14.86% | 1.34% | 11.28% | 8.00% | 0.78% | 2.41% |
GMGEX GMO Global Equity Allocation Fund | 18.76% | 29.14% | 4.12% | 22.27% | -17.07% | 14.99% | 9.55% | 25.45% | -13.04% | 26.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between GABFX and GMGEX is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2009 | 0.02 |
Over the past year, GABFX and GMGEX have become more correlated (0.28) than their long-term average of 0.02, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GABFX vs. GMGEX — Risk / Return Rank
GABFX
GMGEX
GABFX vs. GMGEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Asset Allocation Bond Fund (GABFX) and GMO Global Equity Allocation Fund (GMGEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GABFX | GMGEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.57 | -0.57 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.04 | 4.46 | -4.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.10 | 17.42 | -17.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GABFX vs. GMGEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GABFX drawdown since its inception was -27.84%, smaller than the maximum GMGEX drawdown of -58.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GABFX and GMGEX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GABFX | GMGEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.84% | -58.47% | +30.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.58% | -9.24% | -0.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.48% | -17.12% | -2.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.84% | -28.58% | +0.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.84% | -34.98% | +7.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.62% | -0.91% | -17.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.33% | -16.72% | +9.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.92% | 2.36% | +1.56% |
Volatility
GABFX vs. GMGEX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GMO Asset Allocation Bond Fund (GABFX) is 2.31%, while GMO Global Equity Allocation Fund (GMGEX) has a volatility of 4.75%. This indicates that GABFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GMGEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GABFX | GMGEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.31% | 4.75% | -2.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.59% | 10.65% | -4.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.22% | 13.23% | -3.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.03% | 14.89% | -0.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.37% | 16.08% | -5.71% |
GABFX vs. GMGEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GABFX has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than GMGEX's 0.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
GABFX vs. GMGEX - Dividend Comparison
GABFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, less than GMGEX's 3.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GABFX GMO Asset Allocation Bond Fund | 2.83% | 2.69% | 4.19% | 5.03% | 0.71% | 1.81% | 1.20% | 4.72% | 5.13% | 1.07% | 0.00% | 7.43% |
GMGEX GMO Global Equity Allocation Fund | 3.95% | 4.69% | 0.29% | 5.62% | 7.81% | 7.76% | 3.83% | 3.14% | 3.14% | 2.90% | 3.71% | 4.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GABFX and GMGEX have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GMGEX has higher volatility (4.75%) compared to GABFX (2.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GABFX dropped -27.84% vs GMGEX's -58.47%.
GMGEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.12 vs -0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GABFX and GMGEX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer