GABF vs. IAT

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

GABF (Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF) and IAT (iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF) are both Financials Equities funds. GABF is actively managed, while IAT is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, GABF returned 20.28%/yr vs 26.05%/yr for IAT. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GABF charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for IAT.

Performance

GABF vs. IAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF) and iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF (IAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GABF achieves a -0.55% return, which is significantly lower than IAT's 19.57% return.

GABF

• 1D: 0.60%
• 1M: 1.78%
• 6M: -4.09%
• YTD: -0.55%
• 1Y: -2.77%
• 3Y*: 20.28%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IAT

• 1D: 2.00%
• 1M: 8.29%
• 6M: 15.61%
• YTD: 19.57%
• 1Y: 31.32%
• 3Y*: 26.05%
• 5Y*: 6.40%
• 10Y*: 9.84%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GABF vs. IAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
GABF Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF	-0.55%	3.60%	44.38%	38.92%	-0.04%
IAT iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF	19.57%	13.05%	24.36%	-8.53%	-7.19%

Correlation

The correlation between GABF and IAT is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2022	0.79

The correlation between GABF and IAT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

GABF vs. IAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GABF	IAT
Financial Services	85.6%	100.0%
Technology	5.2%	-
Industrials	4.9%	-
Real Estate	4.3%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

GABF vs. IAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GABF

GABF Risk / Return Rank: 8
GABF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
GABF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
GABF Omega Ratio Rank: 7
GABF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
GABF Martin Ratio Rank: 8

IAT

IAT Risk / Return Rank: 46
IAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
IAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
IAT Omega Ratio Rank: 51
IAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
IAT Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GABF vs. IAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF) and iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF (IAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GABF	IAT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.16	1.44	-1.60
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.10	1.97	-2.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	1.26	-0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.16	1.80	-1.96
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.36	4.59	-4.95

GABF vs. IAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GABF Sharpe Ratio is -0.16, which is lower than the IAT Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GABF and IAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GABF vs. IAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GABF drawdown since its inception was -20.86%, smaller than the maximum IAT drawdown of -77.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GABF and IAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	GABF	IAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.86%	-77.22%	+56.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.16%	-17.49%	+0.33%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.86%	-29.29%	+8.43%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-55.55%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-55.55%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.44%	0.00%	-5.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.95%	-26.83%	+21.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.80%	6.84%	+0.96%

Volatility

GABF vs. IAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF) is 4.48%, while iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF (IAT) has a volatility of 5.56%. This indicates that GABF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GABF	IAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.48%	5.56%	-1.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.33%	16.40%	-3.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.49%	21.86%	-4.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.42%	28.87%	-8.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.42%	30.66%	-10.24%

GABF vs. IAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

GABF has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than IAT's 0.42% expense ratio.

Dividends

GABF vs. IAT - Dividend Comparison

GABF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.97%, less than IAT's 2.48% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GABF Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF	1.97%	1.96%	4.19%	4.95%	1.31%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IAT iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF	2.48%	2.94%	2.95%	3.56%	3.12%	1.88%	2.87%	2.49%	2.48%	1.55%	1.52%	1.78%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GABF and IAT in my portfolio?

GABF and IAT have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GABF or IAT?

IAT has higher volatility (5.56%) compared to GABF (4.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GABF dropped -20.86% vs IAT's -77.22%.

Which ETF is better, GABF or IAT?

On 3-year performance, IAT leads with 26.05% vs 20.28% for GABF. On fees, GABF is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, GABF has been the lower-risk option at 4.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GABF or IAT?

Over the 3-year period, IAT has performed better with a 26.05% return vs 20.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GABF or IAT?

GABF is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for IAT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GABF or IAT?

IAT has the higher dividend yield at 2.48%, compared with 1.97% for GABF.

What is the main difference between GABF and IAT?

They also come from different issuers: Gabelli and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for GABF and 0.42% for IAT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.