GABF vs. FDRV

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

GABF (Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF) and FDRV (Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GABF is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by Gabelli, while FDRV is a Transportation Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, GABF returned 21.50%/yr vs 2.61%/yr for FDRV. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GABF charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for FDRV.

Performance

GABF vs. FDRV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF) and Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF (FDRV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GABF achieves a -4.42% return, which is significantly lower than FDRV's 17.13% return.

GABF

• 1D: -0.39%
• 1M: 0.90%
• YTD: -4.42%
• 6M: -5.68%
• 1Y: -1.50%
• 3Y*: 21.50%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FDRV

• 1D: -4.46%
• 1M: -4.34%
• YTD: 17.13%
• 6M: 15.44%
• 1Y: 34.83%
• 3Y*: 2.61%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GABF vs. FDRV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
GABF Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF	-4.42%	3.60%	44.38%	38.92%	-0.04%
FDRV Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF	17.13%	24.32%	-21.73%	12.27%	-14.92%

Correlation

The correlation between GABF and FDRV is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.52
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2022	0.61

The correlation between GABF and FDRV shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (1 year) to 0.61 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GABF vs. FDRV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GABF	FDRV
Financial Services	85.6%	-
Technology	5.2%	48.6%
Industrials	4.9%	8.8%
Real Estate	4.3%	-
Basic Materials	-	3.5%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	38.8%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

GABF vs. FDRV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GABF

GABF Risk / Return Rank: 8
GABF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
GABF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
GABF Omega Ratio Rank: 7
GABF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
GABF Martin Ratio Rank: 8

FDRV

FDRV Risk / Return Rank: 41
FDRV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
FDRV Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
FDRV Omega Ratio Rank: 37
FDRV Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
FDRV Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GABF vs. FDRV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF) and Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF (FDRV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GABF	FDRV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.09	1.29	-1.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.00	1.80	-1.80
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	1.23	-0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.09	2.24	-2.33
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.20	6.46	-6.66

GABF vs. FDRV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GABF Sharpe Ratio is -0.09, which is lower than the FDRV Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GABF and FDRV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GABF vs. FDRV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GABF drawdown since its inception was -20.86%, smaller than the maximum FDRV drawdown of -63.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GABF and FDRV.

Drawdown Indicators

	GABF	FDRV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.86%	-63.89%	+43.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.16%	-15.62%	-1.54%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.86%	-48.45%	+27.59%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.12%	-35.19%	+26.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.90%	-42.21%	+37.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.55%	5.41%	+2.14%

Volatility

GABF vs. FDRV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF) is 4.38%, while Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF (FDRV) has a volatility of 13.44%. This indicates that GABF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDRV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GABF	FDRV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.38%	13.44%	-9.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.29%	21.70%	-8.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.47%	27.09%	-9.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.48%	32.28%	-11.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.48%	32.28%	-11.80%

GABF vs. FDRV - Expense Ratio Comparison

GABF has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than FDRV's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

GABF vs. FDRV - Dividend Comparison

GABF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%, more than FDRV's 1.22% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FDRV Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF	1.22%	1.14%	0.43%	0.24%	0.33%	0.04%
GABF Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF	2.05%	1.96%	4.19%	4.95%	1.31%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GABF and FDRV in my portfolio?

GABF and FDRV have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GABF or FDRV?

FDRV has higher volatility (13.44%) compared to GABF (4.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GABF dropped -20.86% vs FDRV's -63.89%.

Which ETF is better, GABF or FDRV?

On 3-year performance, GABF leads with 21.50% vs 2.61% for FDRV. On fees, GABF is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, GABF has been the lower-risk option at 4.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GABF or FDRV?

Over the 3-year period, GABF has performed better with a 21.50% return vs 2.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GABF or FDRV?

GABF is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for FDRV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GABF or FDRV?

GABF has the higher dividend yield at 2.05%, compared with 1.22% for FDRV.

What is the main difference between GABF and FDRV?

GABF is categorized as Financials Equities, while FDRV is Transportation Equities. They also come from different issuers: Gabelli and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for GABF and 0.39% for FDRV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FDRV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs -0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.