PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GAAEX vs. NALFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GAAEX vs. NALFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Guinness Atkinson Alternative Energy Fund (GAAEX) and New Alternatives Fund (NALFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with GAAEX having a 19.37% return and NALFX slightly lower at 18.65%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GAAEX having a 10.98% annualized return and NALFX not far behind at 10.87%.


GAAEX

1D
-0.52%
1M
5.57%
YTD
19.37%
6M
18.26%
1Y
41.34%
3Y*
6.62%
5Y*
3.98%
10Y*
10.98%

NALFX

1D
-0.45%
1M
1.83%
YTD
18.65%
6M
19.66%
1Y
31.73%
3Y*
10.82%
5Y*
3.11%
10Y*
10.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GAAEX vs. NALFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GAAEX
Guinness Atkinson Alternative Energy Fund
19.37%26.64%-11.85%-2.39%-12.67%8.40%86.45%30.20%-15.49%20.68%
NALFX
New Alternatives Fund
18.65%28.13%-6.03%-2.49%-15.87%-4.78%61.74%36.98%-6.91%21.24%

Correlation

The correlation between GAAEX and NALFX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2006

0.76

The correlation between GAAEX and NALFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GAAEX vs. NALFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GAAEX
GAAEX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
GAAEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GAAEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
GAAEX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
GAAEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
GAAEX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

NALFX
NALFX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
NALFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NALFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
NALFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
NALFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
NALFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GAAEX vs. NALFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guinness Atkinson Alternative Energy Fund (GAAEX) and New Alternatives Fund (NALFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GAAEXNALFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.37

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.94

4.24

-1.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.44

12.67

-2.24

GAAEX vs. NALFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GAAEX Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is comparable to the NALFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GAAEX and NALFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GAAEXNALFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.21

2.16

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

0.18

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.60

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.06

0.43

-0.49

Drawdowns

GAAEX vs. NALFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GAAEX drawdown since its inception was -85.83%, which is greater than NALFX's maximum drawdown of -59.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAAEX and NALFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GAAEXNALFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.83%

-59.67%

-26.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.57%

-7.53%

-7.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.21%

-24.52%

-10.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.64%

-38.03%

-2.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.64%

-42.35%

+1.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-49.08%

-0.50%

-48.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-63.64%

-14.84%

-48.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.10%

2.52%

+1.58%

Volatility

GAAEX vs. NALFX - Volatility Comparison

Guinness Atkinson Alternative Energy Fund (GAAEX) has a higher volatility of 7.58% compared to New Alternatives Fund (NALFX) at 5.32%. This indicates that GAAEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NALFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GAAEXNALFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.58%

5.32%

+2.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.12%

11.88%

+3.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.45%

14.80%

+4.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.46%

17.82%

+4.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.38%

18.03%

+4.35%

GAAEX vs. NALFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GAAEX has a 1.98% expense ratio, which is higher than NALFX's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

GAAEX vs. NALFX - Dividend Comparison

GAAEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, less than NALFX's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GAAEX
Guinness Atkinson Alternative Energy Fund
0.27%0.33%0.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.09%0.28%0.00%0.00%
NALFX
New Alternatives Fund
0.98%1.17%2.04%4.47%4.63%5.14%4.93%5.55%6.62%4.16%3.71%1.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


GAAEX and NALFX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GAAEX has higher volatility (7.58%) compared to NALFX (5.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GAAEX dropped -85.83% vs NALFX's -59.67%.

GAAEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GAAEX and NALFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer