GAAEX vs. MFWIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Guinness Atkinson Alternative Energy Fund (GAAEX) and MFS Global Total Return Fund Class I (MFWIX).
GAAEX is managed by Guinness Atkinson. It was launched on Mar 30, 2006. MFWIX is managed by MFS. It was launched on Sep 4, 1990.
Performance
GAAEX vs. MFWIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GAAEX vs. MFWIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAAEX Guinness Atkinson Alternative Energy Fund | -0.63% | 26.64% | -11.85% | -2.39% | -12.67% | 8.40% | 86.45% | 30.20% | -15.49% | 20.68% |
MFWIX MFS Global Total Return Fund Class I | 0.94% | 15.70% | 4.25% | 10.52% | -10.62% | 8.59% | 9.63% | 18.49% | -6.96% | 15.00% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GAAEX achieves a -0.63% return, which is significantly lower than MFWIX's 0.94% return. Over the past 10 years, GAAEX has outperformed MFWIX with an annualized return of 8.61%, while MFWIX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.34% annualized return.
GAAEX
- 1D
- 3.44%
- 1M
- -8.28%
- YTD
- -0.63%
- 6M
- 0.16%
- 1Y
- 31.88%
- 3Y*
- -0.28%
- 5Y*
- -0.08%
- 10Y*
- 8.61%
MFWIX
- 1D
- 1.42%
- 1M
- -4.39%
- YTD
- 0.94%
- 6M
- 3.21%
- 1Y
- 12.92%
- 3Y*
- 9.39%
- 5Y*
- 4.91%
- 10Y*
- 6.34%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GAAEX vs. MFWIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GAAEX has a 1.98% expense ratio, which is higher than MFWIX's 0.84% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GAAEX vs. MFWIX — Risk / Return Rank
GAAEX
MFWIX
GAAEX vs. MFWIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guinness Atkinson Alternative Energy Fund (GAAEX) and MFS Global Total Return Fund Class I (MFWIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GAAEX | MFWIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.47 | 1.44 | +0.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.14 | 1.99 | +0.15 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.28 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.15 | 1.89 | +0.27 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.83 | 7.31 | +0.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GAAEX | MFWIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.47 | 1.44 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.00 | 0.54 | -0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 | 0.66 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.10 | 0.71 | -0.81 |
Correlation
The correlation between GAAEX and MFWIX is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GAAEX vs. MFWIX - Dividend Comparison
GAAEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than MFWIX's 8.68% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAAEX Guinness Atkinson Alternative Energy Fund | 0.33% | 0.33% | 0.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.09% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MFWIX MFS Global Total Return Fund Class I | 8.68% | 8.77% | 9.36% | 3.98% | 2.94% | 10.71% | 7.53% | 4.70% | 3.64% | 2.36% | 1.40% | 4.59% |
Drawdowns
GAAEX vs. MFWIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GAAEX drawdown since its inception was -85.83%, which is greater than MFWIX's maximum drawdown of -33.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAAEX and MFWIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GAAEX | MFWIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.83% | -33.01% | -52.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.57% | -6.85% | -7.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.64% | -20.22% | -20.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.64% | -23.36% | -17.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -57.61% | -5.18% | -52.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.74% | -3.83% | -59.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.00% | 1.77% | +2.23% |
Volatility
GAAEX vs. MFWIX - Volatility Comparison
Guinness Atkinson Alternative Energy Fund (GAAEX) has a higher volatility of 7.75% compared to MFS Global Total Return Fund Class I (MFWIX) at 3.44%. This indicates that GAAEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MFWIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GAAEX | MFWIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.75% | 3.44% | +4.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.24% | 5.43% | +8.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.20% | 8.94% | +13.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.27% | 9.11% | +13.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.26% | 9.61% | +12.65% |