GAA vs. MDAA

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GAA (Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF) and MDAA (Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GAA charges 0.41%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for MDAA.

Performance

GAA vs. MDAA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF (GAA) and Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF (MDAA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GAA achieves a 9.39% return, which is significantly lower than MDAA's 23.50% return.

GAA

• 1D: -0.66%
• 1M: 1.35%
• YTD: 9.39%
• 6M: 11.23%
• 1Y: 22.62%
• 3Y*: 14.43%
• 5Y*: 6.37%
• 10Y*: 7.72%

MDAA

• 1D: 1.44%
• 1M: 8.38%
• YTD: 23.50%
• 6M: 24.41%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GAA vs. MDAA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GAA Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF	9.39%	3.62%
MDAA Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF	23.50%	-0.27%

Correlation

The correlation between GAA and MDAA is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2025	0.66

Return for Risk

GAA vs. MDAA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GAA

GAA Risk / Return Rank: 76
GAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
GAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
GAA Omega Ratio Rank: 76
GAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
GAA Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GAA vs. MDAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF (GAA) and Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF (MDAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GAA	MDAA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.48	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.50	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.93	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	15.04	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GAA	MDAA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.48	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.57	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.70	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.63	1.57	-0.94

Drawdowns

GAA vs. MDAA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GAA drawdown since its inception was -26.57%, which is greater than MDAA's maximum drawdown of -14.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAA and MDAA.

Drawdown Indicators

	GAA	MDAA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.57%	-14.59%	-11.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.78%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.18%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.47%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-26.57%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.66%	0.00%	-0.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.85%	-2.94%	-0.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.51%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GAA	MDAA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.60%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.41%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.19%	23.91%	-14.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.28%	23.91%	-12.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.09%	23.91%	-12.82%

GAA vs. MDAA - Expense Ratio Comparison

GAA has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is lower than MDAA's 0.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

GAA vs. MDAA - Dividend Comparison

GAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.59%, more than MDAA's 0.37% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GAA Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF	3.59%	4.24%	3.88%	3.73%	6.05%	4.21%	2.73%	3.32%	3.01%	2.36%	2.82%	2.49%
MDAA Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF	0.37%	0.46%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GAA and MDAA in my portfolio?

GAA and MDAA have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GAA or MDAA?

On fees, GAA is cheaper at 0.41% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GAA or MDAA?

GAA is cheaper with a 0.41% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for MDAA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GAA or MDAA?

GAA has the higher dividend yield at 3.59%, compared with 0.37% for MDAA.

What is the main difference between GAA and MDAA?

They also come from different issuers: Cambria and Myriad. Their fees differ too: 0.41% for GAA and 0.97% for MDAA.