GAA vs. AAVM
GAA (Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF) and AAVM (Alpha Architect Global Factor Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GAA is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by Cambria, while AAVM is a Multi-factor fund actively managed by Alpha Architect. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, GAA returned 6.12%/yr vs 6.54%/yr for AAVM. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GAA charges 0.41%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for AAVM.
Performance
GAA vs. AAVM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GAA achieves a 6.98% return, which is significantly lower than AAVM's 13.98% return.
GAA
- 1D
- -2.33%
- 1M
- -1.58%
- YTD
- 6.98%
- 6M
- 7.10%
- 1Y
- 17.83%
- 3Y*
- 13.29%
- 5Y*
- 6.12%
- 10Y*
- 7.57%
AAVM
- 1D
- -1.90%
- 1M
- -1.17%
- YTD
- 13.98%
- 6M
- 12.98%
- 1Y
- 29.85%
- 3Y*
- 18.21%
- 5Y*
- 6.54%
- 10Y*
- —
GAA vs. AAVM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAA Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF | 6.98% | 18.76% | 6.67% | 7.65% | -8.47% | 11.17% | 9.11% | 15.12% | -7.15% | 8.01% |
AAVM Alpha Architect Global Factor Equity ETF | 13.98% | 18.54% | 12.07% | -0.74% | -7.00% | 3.52% | 4.69% | 4.59% | -15.64% | 14.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between GAA and AAVM is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2017 | 0.57 |
The correlation between GAA and AAVM shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (5 years) to 0.68 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GAA vs. AAVM — Risk / Return Rank
GAA
AAVM
GAA vs. AAVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF (GAA) and Alpha Architect Global Factor Equity ETF (AAVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GAA | AAVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.34 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.10 | 2.76 | +0.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.58 | 11.28 | +0.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GAA vs. AAVM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GAA drawdown since its inception was -26.57%, smaller than the maximum AAVM drawdown of -34.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAA and AAVM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GAA | AAVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.57% | -34.71% | +8.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.78% | -10.85% | +5.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.18% | -20.23% | +13.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.47% | -23.73% | +5.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.57% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.85% | -3.36% | +0.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.84% | -13.25% | +9.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.54% | 2.65% | -1.11% |
Volatility
GAA vs. AAVM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF (GAA) is 3.96%, while Alpha Architect Global Factor Equity ETF (AAVM) has a volatility of 5.92%. This indicates that GAA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AAVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GAA | AAVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.96% | 5.92% | -1.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.16% | 13.79% | -5.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.56% | 16.05% | -6.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.37% | 15.80% | -4.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.12% | 14.96% | -3.84% |
GAA vs. AAVM - Expense Ratio Comparison
GAA has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is lower than AAVM's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
GAA vs. AAVM - Dividend Comparison
GAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.67%, more than AAVM's 1.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAVM Alpha Architect Global Factor Equity ETF | 1.80% | 2.05% | 2.54% | 4.13% | 2.24% | 0.82% | 0.00% | 1.76% | 0.93% | 0.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GAA Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF | 3.67% | 4.24% | 3.88% | 3.73% | 6.05% | 4.21% | 2.73% | 3.32% | 3.01% | 2.36% | 2.82% | 2.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GAA and AAVM have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AAVM has higher volatility (5.92%) compared to GAA (3.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GAA dropped -26.57% vs AAVM's -34.71%.
On 5-year performance, AAVM leads with 6.54% vs 6.12% for GAA. On fees, GAA is cheaper at 0.41% per year. On volatility, GAA has been the lower-risk option at 3.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AAVM has performed better with a 6.54% return vs 6.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GAA is cheaper with a 0.41% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for AAVM.
GAA has the higher dividend yield at 3.67%, compared with 1.80% for AAVM.
GAA is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while AAVM is Multi-factor. They also come from different issuers: Cambria and Alpha Architect. Their fees differ too: 0.41% for GAA and 0.45% for AAVM.
GAA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GAA and AAVM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer