PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
G2XJ.DE vs. M9SD.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

G2XJ.DE vs. M9SD.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in VanEck Junior Gold Miners UCITS (G2XJ.DE) and Market Access NYSE Arca Gold Bugs UCITS ETF (M9SD.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, G2XJ.DE achieves a -3.74% return, which is significantly lower than M9SD.DE's 3.74% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with G2XJ.DE having a 12.60% annualized return and M9SD.DE not far behind at 12.24%.


G2XJ.DE

1D
0.42%
1M
-7.94%
YTD
-3.74%
6M
7.08%
1Y
60.21%
3Y*
42.43%
5Y*
18.76%
10Y*
12.60%

M9SD.DE

1D
1.07%
1M
-4.44%
YTD
3.74%
6M
11.23%
1Y
69.16%
3Y*
40.66%
5Y*
20.23%
10Y*
12.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

G2XJ.DE vs. M9SD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
G2XJ.DE
VanEck Junior Gold Miners UCITS
-3.74%149.58%21.45%3.64%-6.09%-15.55%18.76%43.18%-8.98%-10.97%
M9SD.DE
Market Access NYSE Arca Gold Bugs UCITS ETF
3.74%130.74%20.64%2.95%-2.13%-8.52%14.07%50.51%-13.27%-11.82%

Correlation

The correlation between G2XJ.DE and M9SD.DE is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2015

0.92

The correlation between G2XJ.DE and M9SD.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

G2XJ.DE vs. M9SD.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

G2XJ.DE
G2XJ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
G2XJ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
G2XJ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
G2XJ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
G2XJ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
G2XJ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

M9SD.DE
M9SD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
M9SD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
M9SD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
M9SD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
M9SD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
M9SD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

G2XJ.DE vs. M9SD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Junior Gold Miners UCITS (G2XJ.DE) and Market Access NYSE Arca Gold Bugs UCITS ETF (M9SD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


G2XJ.DEM9SD.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.27

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.11

2.56

-0.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.07

6.47

-1.40

G2XJ.DE vs. M9SD.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current G2XJ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is comparable to the M9SD.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of G2XJ.DE and M9SD.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


G2XJ.DEM9SD.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.33

1.65

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.58

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

0.35

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.12

+0.26

Drawdowns

G2XJ.DE vs. M9SD.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum G2XJ.DE drawdown since its inception was -49.96%, smaller than the maximum M9SD.DE drawdown of -80.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for G2XJ.DE and M9SD.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


G2XJ.DEM9SD.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.96%

-80.12%

+30.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.24%

-27.35%

-1.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.24%

-27.35%

-1.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.82%

-39.62%

-1.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.96%

-55.80%

+5.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.97%

-22.37%

-3.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.26%

-42.59%

+17.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.16%

10.84%

+1.32%

Volatility

G2XJ.DE vs. M9SD.DE - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Junior Gold Miners UCITS (G2XJ.DE) has a higher volatility of 15.07% compared to Market Access NYSE Arca Gold Bugs UCITS ETF (M9SD.DE) at 13.40%. This indicates that G2XJ.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than M9SD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


G2XJ.DEM9SD.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.07%

13.40%

+1.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.04%

33.87%

+4.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.48%

42.57%

+3.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.98%

34.36%

+2.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.69%

34.73%

+2.96%

G2XJ.DE vs. M9SD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

G2XJ.DE has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than M9SD.DE's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

G2XJ.DE vs. M9SD.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither G2XJ.DE nor M9SD.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, G2XJ.DE and M9SD.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, G2XJ.DE is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

G2XJ.DE is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for M9SD.DE.

G2XJ.DE tracks MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners, while M9SD.DE tracks NYSE Arca Gold BUGS. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and China Post Global. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for G2XJ.DE and 0.65% for M9SD.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for G2XJ.DE and M9SD.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer