G2XJ.DE vs. IQSA.DE
G2XJ.DE (VanEck Junior Gold Miners UCITS) and IQSA.DE (Invesco Global Active ESG Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - G2XJ.DE is a Precious Metals fund tracking the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners, while IQSA.DE is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Invesco. G2XJ.DE is passively managed, while IQSA.DE is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, G2XJ.DE returned 18.76%/yr vs 15.45%/yr for IQSA.DE. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. G2XJ.DE charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for IQSA.DE.
Performance
G2XJ.DE vs. IQSA.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, G2XJ.DE achieves a -3.74% return, which is significantly lower than IQSA.DE's 14.81% return.
G2XJ.DE
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- -7.94%
- YTD
- -3.74%
- 6M
- 7.08%
- 1Y
- 60.21%
- 3Y*
- 42.43%
- 5Y*
- 18.76%
- 10Y*
- 12.60%
IQSA.DE
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 4.49%
- YTD
- 14.81%
- 6M
- 16.12%
- 1Y
- 28.39%
- 3Y*
- 22.03%
- 5Y*
- 15.45%
- 10Y*
- —
G2XJ.DE vs. IQSA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
G2XJ.DE VanEck Junior Gold Miners UCITS | -3.74% | 149.58% | 21.45% | 3.64% | -6.09% | -15.55% | 18.76% | 1.12% |
IQSA.DE Invesco Global Active ESG Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc | 14.81% | 9.64% | 29.92% | 20.24% | -9.32% | 35.68% | 0.13% | 13.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between G2XJ.DE and IQSA.DE is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2019 | 0.20 |
The correlation between G2XJ.DE and IQSA.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (all time) to 0.32 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
G2XJ.DE vs. IQSA.DE — Risk / Return Rank
G2XJ.DE
IQSA.DE
G2XJ.DE vs. IQSA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Junior Gold Miners UCITS (G2XJ.DE) and Invesco Global Active ESG Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc (IQSA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| G2XJ.DE | IQSA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.43 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.11 | 4.60 | -2.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.07 | 18.23 | -13.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| G2XJ.DE | IQSA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.33 | 2.34 | -1.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 1.04 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.94 | -0.55 |
Drawdowns
G2XJ.DE vs. IQSA.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum G2XJ.DE drawdown since its inception was -49.96%, which is greater than IQSA.DE's maximum drawdown of -34.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for G2XJ.DE and IQSA.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| G2XJ.DE | IQSA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.96% | -34.11% | -15.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.24% | -6.20% | -23.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.24% | -21.35% | -7.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.82% | -21.35% | -19.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.96% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.97% | -0.33% | -25.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.26% | -4.38% | -20.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.16% | 1.57% | +10.59% |
Volatility
G2XJ.DE vs. IQSA.DE - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Junior Gold Miners UCITS (G2XJ.DE) has a higher volatility of 15.07% compared to Invesco Global Active ESG Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc (IQSA.DE) at 3.32%. This indicates that G2XJ.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IQSA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| G2XJ.DE | IQSA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.07% | 3.32% | +11.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.04% | 8.85% | +29.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.48% | 12.17% | +34.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.98% | 14.71% | +22.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.69% | 16.74% | +20.95% |
G2XJ.DE vs. IQSA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
G2XJ.DE has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than IQSA.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
G2XJ.DE vs. IQSA.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither G2XJ.DE nor IQSA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
G2XJ.DE and IQSA.DE have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IQSA.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IQSA.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for G2XJ.DE.
G2XJ.DE is categorized as Precious Metals, while IQSA.DE is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for G2XJ.DE and 0.30% for IQSA.DE.
Find the right allocation for G2XJ.DE and IQSA.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer