PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
G2XJ.DE vs. GLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

G2XJ.DE vs. GLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in VanEck Junior Gold Miners UCITS (G2XJ.DE) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

G2XJ.DE is traded in EUR, while GLD is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GLD values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, G2XJ.DE achieves a -3.74% return, which is significantly lower than GLD's 4.96% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with G2XJ.DE having a 12.60% annualized return and GLD not far ahead at 12.97%.


G2XJ.DE

1D
0.42%
1M
-7.94%
YTD
-3.74%
6M
7.08%
1Y
60.21%
3Y*
42.43%
5Y*
18.76%
10Y*
12.60%

GLD

1D
0.00%
1M
-3.47%
YTD
4.96%
6M
6.67%
1Y
31.01%
3Y*
27.58%
5Y*
19.45%
10Y*
12.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

G2XJ.DE vs. GLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
G2XJ.DE
VanEck Junior Gold Miners UCITS
-3.74%149.58%21.45%3.64%-6.09%-15.55%18.76%43.18%-8.98%-10.97%
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
1.94%44.25%35.02%9.31%5.38%3.02%14.53%20.52%2.66%-1.05%

Correlation

The correlation between G2XJ.DE and GLD is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2015

0.55

The correlation between G2XJ.DE and GLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (all time) to 0.65 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

G2XJ.DE vs. GLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

G2XJ.DE
G2XJ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
G2XJ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
G2XJ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
G2XJ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
G2XJ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
G2XJ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

GLD
GLD Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
GLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLD Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
GLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLD Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

G2XJ.DE vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Junior Gold Miners UCITS (G2XJ.DE) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


G2XJ.DEGLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.25

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.11

1.82

+0.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.07

4.30

+0.77

G2XJ.DE vs. GLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current G2XJ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is comparable to the GLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of G2XJ.DE and GLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


G2XJ.DEGLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.33

1.24

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

1.17

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

0.87

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.65

-0.27

Drawdowns

G2XJ.DE vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum G2XJ.DE drawdown since its inception was -49.96%, which is greater than GLD's maximum drawdown of -37.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for G2XJ.DE and GLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


G2XJ.DEGLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.96%

-37.47%

-12.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.24%

-17.14%

-12.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.24%

-17.14%

-12.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.82%

-17.14%

-23.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.96%

-18.63%

-31.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.97%

-15.52%

-10.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.26%

-12.17%

-13.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.16%

7.23%

+4.93%

Volatility

G2XJ.DE vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Junior Gold Miners UCITS (G2XJ.DE) has a higher volatility of 15.07% compared to SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) at 3.75%. This indicates that G2XJ.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


G2XJ.DEGLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.07%

3.75%

+11.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.04%

21.79%

+16.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.48%

25.17%

+21.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.98%

16.69%

+20.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.69%

14.91%

+22.78%

G2XJ.DE vs. GLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

G2XJ.DE has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than GLD's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

G2XJ.DE vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison

Neither G2XJ.DE nor GLD has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


G2XJ.DE and GLD have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GLD is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GLD is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for G2XJ.DE.

G2XJ.DE is categorized as Precious Metals, while GLD is Gold. G2XJ.DE tracks MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners, while GLD tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for G2XJ.DE and 0.40% for GLD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for G2XJ.DE and GLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer