PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
G2X.DE vs. XGDU.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

G2X.DE vs. XGDU.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in VanEck Gold Miners UCITS ETF (G2X.DE) and Xtrackers IE Physical Gold ETC Securities (XGDU.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, G2X.DE achieves a -3.35% return, which is significantly lower than XGDU.DE's -1.60% return.


G2X.DE

1D
7.85%
1M
5.72%
6M
-10.98%
YTD
-3.35%
1Y
51.33%
3Y*
41.16%
5Y*
22.42%
10Y*
11.22%
ALL TIME*
14.36%

XGDU.DE

1D
4.11%
1M
1.43%
6M
-11.71%
YTD
-1.60%
1Y
26.06%
3Y*
27.85%
5Y*
19.61%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
€4.07M€4.59M€6.27M
€1.95M€1.83M€2.35M

G2X.DE vs. XGDU.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
G2X.DE
VanEck Gold Miners UCITS ETF
-3.35%131.10%17.58%5.59%-0.03%-4.26%4.87%
XGDU.DE
Xtrackers IE Physical Gold ETC Securities
-1.60%49.09%34.21%9.43%6.99%3.80%-10.64%

Correlation

The correlation between G2X.DE and XGDU.DE is 0.83, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2020

0.72

The correlation between G2X.DE and XGDU.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (all time) to 0.83 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

G2X.DE vs. XGDU.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

G2X.DE
G2X.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
G2X.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
G2X.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
G2X.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
G2X.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
G2X.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

XGDU.DE
XGDU.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
XGDU.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XGDU.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
XGDU.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
XGDU.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
XGDU.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

G2X.DE vs. XGDU.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Gold Miners UCITS ETF (G2X.DE) and Xtrackers IE Physical Gold ETC Securities (XGDU.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


G2X.DEXGDU.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.20

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.43

1.15

+0.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.02

2.18

+0.84

G2X.DE vs. XGDU.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current G2X.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is higher than the XGDU.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of G2X.DE and XGDU.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

G2X.DE vs. XGDU.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum G2X.DE drawdown since its inception was -46.04%, which is greater than XGDU.DE's maximum drawdown of -22.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for G2X.DE and XGDU.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


G2X.DEXGDU.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.04%

-22.57%

-23.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.81%

-22.57%

-13.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.81%

-22.57%

-13.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.53%

-22.57%

-15.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.13%

-18.60%

-6.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.09%

-7.09%

-13.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.92%

11.92%

+5.00%

Volatility

G2X.DE vs. XGDU.DE - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Gold Miners UCITS ETF (G2X.DE) has a higher volatility of 14.70% compared to Xtrackers IE Physical Gold ETC Securities (XGDU.DE) at 7.30%. This indicates that G2X.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XGDU.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


G2X.DEXGDU.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.70%

7.30%

+7.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.64%

18.60%

+17.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.57%

33.22%

+13.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.29%

19.24%

+15.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.66%

18.84%

+13.82%

G2X.DE vs. XGDU.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

G2X.DE has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than XGDU.DE's 0.11% expense ratio.


Dividends

G2X.DE vs. XGDU.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither G2X.DE nor XGDU.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


G2X.DE and XGDU.DE have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XGDU.DE is cheaper at 0.11% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XGDU.DE is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for G2X.DE.

G2X.DE tracks NYSE Arca Gold Miners, while XGDU.DE tracks Gold. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.53% for G2X.DE and 0.11% for XGDU.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for G2X.DE and XGDU.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer