PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
G2X.DE vs. IQQH.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

G2X.DE vs. IQQH.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in VanEck Gold Miners UCITS ETF (G2X.DE) and iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IQQH.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, G2X.DE achieves a -8.45% return, which is significantly lower than IQQH.DE's 28.16% return. Over the past 10 years, G2X.DE has outperformed IQQH.DE with an annualized return of 12.83%, while IQQH.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 10.90% annualized return.


G2X.DE

1D
5.67%
1M
-16.53%
YTD
-8.45%
6M
-4.07%
1Y
51.00%
3Y*
35.39%
5Y*
18.31%
10Y*
12.83%

IQQH.DE

1D
3.08%
1M
-3.82%
YTD
28.16%
6M
28.47%
1Y
60.73%
3Y*
2.58%
5Y*
0.42%
10Y*
10.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

G2X.DE vs. IQQH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
G2X.DE
VanEck Gold Miners UCITS ETF
-8.45%131.10%17.58%5.59%-0.03%-4.26%13.26%40.99%-4.38%-5.31%
IQQH.DE
iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
28.16%29.63%-21.56%-22.41%0.55%-18.08%117.29%47.44%-4.63%5.73%

Correlation

The correlation between G2X.DE and IQQH.DE is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2015

0.20

The correlation between G2X.DE and IQQH.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (all time) to 0.34 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

G2X.DE vs. IQQH.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

G2X.DE
G2X.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
G2X.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
G2X.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
G2X.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
G2X.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
G2X.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

IQQH.DE
IQQH.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
IQQH.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQQH.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQQH.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
IQQH.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQQH.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

G2X.DE vs. IQQH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Gold Miners UCITS ETF (G2X.DE) and iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IQQH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


G2X.DEIQQH.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.38

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.52

4.09

-2.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.22

14.08

-9.87

G2X.DE vs. IQQH.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current G2X.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is lower than the IQQH.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of G2X.DE and IQQH.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

G2X.DE vs. IQQH.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum G2X.DE drawdown since its inception was -46.04%, smaller than the maximum IQQH.DE drawdown of -87.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for G2X.DE and IQQH.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


G2X.DEIQQH.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.04%

-87.02%

+40.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.45%

-14.78%

-18.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.45%

-44.07%

+10.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.53%

-57.98%

+19.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.04%

-64.20%

+18.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.09%

-40.41%

+11.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.95%

-63.57%

+43.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.02%

4.30%

+7.72%

Volatility

G2X.DE vs. IQQH.DE - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Gold Miners UCITS ETF (G2X.DE) has a higher volatility of 14.79% compared to iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IQQH.DE) at 10.24%. This indicates that G2X.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IQQH.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


G2X.DEIQQH.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.79%

10.24%

+4.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.01%

19.78%

+15.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.27%

25.70%

+17.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.32%

24.95%

+8.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.37%

25.13%

+7.24%

G2X.DE vs. IQQH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

G2X.DE has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is lower than IQQH.DE's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

G2X.DE vs. IQQH.DE - Dividend Comparison

G2X.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IQQH.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
G2X.DE
VanEck Gold Miners UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IQQH.DE
iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
0.88%1.33%1.24%0.80%0.53%0.73%0.49%1.56%2.87%2.88%2.81%2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


G2X.DE and IQQH.DE have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, G2X.DE is cheaper at 0.53% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

G2X.DE is cheaper with a 0.53% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for IQQH.DE.

G2X.DE is categorized as Precious Metals, while IQQH.DE is Energy Equities. G2X.DE tracks NYSE Arca Gold Miners, while IQQH.DE tracks S&P Global Clean Energy. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.53% for G2X.DE and 0.65% for IQQH.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for G2X.DE and IQQH.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer