PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
G vs. SIS.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

G vs. SIS.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Genpact Limited (G) and Savaria Corporation (SIS.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

G is traded in USD, while SIS.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the SIS.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, G achieves a -29.90% return, which is significantly lower than SIS.TO's 30.75% return. Over the past 10 years, G has underperformed SIS.TO with an annualized return of 2.67%, while SIS.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 16.52% annualized return.


G

1D
0.71%
1M
0.21%
YTD
-29.90%
6M
-28.34%
1Y
-23.21%
3Y*
-3.22%
5Y*
-5.10%
10Y*
2.67%

SIS.TO

1D
0.85%
1M
4.16%
YTD
30.75%
6M
39.53%
1Y
58.15%
3Y*
23.43%
5Y*
8.59%
10Y*
16.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

G vs. SIS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
G
Genpact Limited
-29.90%10.56%25.78%-23.98%-11.74%29.51%-0.93%57.66%-14.12%31.54%
SIS.TO
Savaria Corporation
30.75%23.41%24.33%14.89%-28.95%35.99%9.98%15.16%-32.30%83.89%

Correlation

The correlation between G and SIS.TO is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2007

0.17

The correlation between G and SIS.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (1 year) to 0.24 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

G:

$5.64B

SIS.TO:

CA$2.19B

EPS

G:

$3.25

SIS.TO:

CA$1.10

PE Ratio

G:

10.04

SIS.TO:

27.43

PEG Ratio

G:

0.56

SIS.TO:

0.43

PS Ratio

G:

1.11

SIS.TO:

2.33

PB Ratio

G:

2.28

SIS.TO:

3.32

Total Revenue (TTM)

G:

$5.16B

SIS.TO:

CA$928.84M

Gross Profit (TTM)

G:

$1.87B

SIS.TO:

CA$362.29M

EBITDA (TTM)

G:

$844.98M

SIS.TO:

CA$176.47M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

G vs. SIS.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

G
G Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
G Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
G Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
G Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
G Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
G Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

SIS.TO
SIS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
SIS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
SIS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

G vs. SIS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Genpact Limited (G) and Savaria Corporation (SIS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GSIS.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.89

1.43

-0.54

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.58

5.90

-6.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.41

17.28

-18.69

G vs. SIS.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current G Sharpe Ratio is -0.67, which is lower than the SIS.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of G and SIS.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSIS.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.67

2.46

-3.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.18

0.31

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

0.50

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

0.36

-0.17

Drawdowns

G vs. SIS.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum G drawdown since its inception was -64.14%, smaller than the maximum SIS.TO drawdown of -77.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for G and SIS.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSIS.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.14%

-77.91%

+13.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-40.04%

-9.91%

-30.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-46.85%

-36.04%

-10.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.85%

-46.92%

+0.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.47%

-66.20%

+16.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.07%

-2.46%

-37.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.52%

-20.89%

+5.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.54%

3.37%

+13.17%

Volatility

G vs. SIS.TO - Volatility Comparison

Genpact Limited (G) has a higher volatility of 13.70% compared to Savaria Corporation (SIS.TO) at 6.58%. This indicates that G's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SIS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSIS.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.70%

6.58%

+7.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.09%

19.07%

+8.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.96%

23.73%

+11.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.66%

27.79%

+0.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.14%

33.06%

-4.92%

Dividends

G vs. SIS.TO - Dividend Comparison

G's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%, more than SIS.TO's 1.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
G
Genpact Limited
2.14%1.45%1.42%1.58%1.08%0.81%0.94%0.81%1.11%0.76%0.00%0.00%
SIS.TO
Savaria Corporation
1.85%2.40%2.65%3.42%3.62%2.54%3.23%3.11%2.91%1.73%1.98%3.09%

Financials

G vs. SIS.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Genpact Limited and Savaria Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B1.40B20222023202420252026
1.30B
235.55M
(G) Total Revenue
(SIS.TO) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. G values in USD, SIS.TO values in CAD

G vs. SIS.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Genpact Limited and Savaria Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

32.0%34.0%36.0%38.0%40.0%20222023202420252026
36.4%
39.0%
Portfolio components
G - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Genpact Limited reported a gross profit of 471.67M and revenue of 1.30B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.4%.

SIS.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Savaria Corporation reported a gross profit of 91.74M and revenue of 235.55M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.0%.

G - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Genpact Limited reported an operating income of 198.58M and revenue of 1.30B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.3%.

SIS.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Savaria Corporation reported an operating income of 33.15M and revenue of 235.55M, resulting in an operating margin of 14.1%.

G - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Genpact Limited reported a net income of 147.99M and revenue of 1.30B, resulting in a net margin of 11.4%.

SIS.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Savaria Corporation reported a net income of 22.68M and revenue of 235.55M, resulting in a net margin of 9.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


G and SIS.TO have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for G and SIS.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer