PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
G vs. FJTSY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

G vs. FJTSY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Genpact Limited (G) and Fujitsu Ltd ADR (FJTSY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, G achieves a -29.90% return, which is significantly lower than FJTSY's -19.33% return. Over the past 10 years, G has underperformed FJTSY with an annualized return of 2.67%, while FJTSY has yielded a comparatively higher 19.10% annualized return.


G

1D
0.71%
1M
0.21%
YTD
-29.90%
6M
-28.34%
1Y
-23.21%
3Y*
-3.22%
5Y*
-5.10%
10Y*
2.67%

FJTSY

1D
-0.05%
1M
2.47%
YTD
-19.33%
6M
-15.00%
1Y
-6.35%
3Y*
17.66%
5Y*
5.49%
10Y*
19.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

G vs. FJTSY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
G
Genpact Limited
-29.90%10.56%25.78%-23.98%-11.74%29.51%-0.93%57.66%-14.12%31.54%
FJTSY
Fujitsu Ltd ADR
-19.33%55.98%17.49%12.77%-22.86%19.18%54.48%49.76%-12.38%29.23%

Correlation

The correlation between G and FJTSY is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2007

0.22

Fundamentals

Market Cap

G:

$5.64B

FJTSY:

$38.24B

EPS

G:

$3.25

FJTSY:

$257.52

PE Ratio

G:

10.04

FJTSY:

0.09

PEG Ratio

G:

0.56

FJTSY:

0.00

PS Ratio

G:

1.11

FJTSY:

0.01

PB Ratio

G:

2.28

FJTSY:

0.02

Total Revenue (TTM)

G:

$5.16B

FJTSY:

$3.55T

Gross Profit (TTM)

G:

$1.87B

FJTSY:

$1.32T

EBITDA (TTM)

G:

$844.98M

FJTSY:

$439.05B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

G vs. FJTSY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

G
G Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
G Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
G Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
G Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
G Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
G Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

FJTSY
FJTSY Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
FJTSY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FJTSY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
FJTSY Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
FJTSY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
FJTSY Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

G vs. FJTSY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Genpact Limited (G) and Fujitsu Ltd ADR (FJTSY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GFJTSYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.89

1.01

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.58

-0.19

-0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.41

-0.42

-0.98

G vs. FJTSY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current G Sharpe Ratio is -0.67, which is lower than the FJTSY Sharpe Ratio of -0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of G and FJTSY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GFJTSYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.67

-0.15

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.18

0.16

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

0.60

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

0.21

-0.03

Drawdowns

G vs. FJTSY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum G drawdown since its inception was -64.14%, roughly equal to the maximum FJTSY drawdown of -62.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for G and FJTSY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GFJTSYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.14%

-62.04%

-2.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-40.04%

-33.59%

-6.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-46.85%

-33.59%

-13.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.85%

-47.55%

+0.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.47%

-47.55%

-1.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.07%

-24.33%

-15.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.52%

-22.75%

+7.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.54%

15.04%

+1.50%

Volatility

G vs. FJTSY - Volatility Comparison

Genpact Limited (G) and Fujitsu Ltd ADR (FJTSY) have volatilities of 13.70% and 13.74%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GFJTSYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.70%

13.74%

-0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.09%

34.57%

-7.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.96%

43.06%

-8.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.66%

33.78%

-5.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.14%

31.81%

-3.67%

Dividends

G vs. FJTSY - Dividend Comparison

G's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%, while FJTSY has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FJTSY
Fujitsu Ltd ADR
0.00%0.36%0.53%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.63%1.30%1.30%
G
Genpact Limited
2.14%1.45%1.42%1.58%1.08%0.81%0.94%0.81%1.11%0.76%0.00%0.00%

Financials

G vs. FJTSY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Genpact Limited and Fujitsu Ltd ADR. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00B400.00B600.00B800.00B1.00T1.20T20222023202420252026
1.30B
1.07T
(G) Total Revenue
(FJTSY) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

G vs. FJTSY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Genpact Limited and Fujitsu Ltd ADR over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%35.0%40.0%20222023202420252026
36.4%
42.8%
Portfolio components
G - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Genpact Limited reported a gross profit of 471.67M and revenue of 1.30B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.4%.

FJTSY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fujitsu Ltd ADR reported a gross profit of 458.88B and revenue of 1.07T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.8%.

G - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Genpact Limited reported an operating income of 198.58M and revenue of 1.30B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.3%.

FJTSY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fujitsu Ltd ADR reported an operating income of 154.67B and revenue of 1.07T, resulting in an operating margin of 14.4%.

G - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Genpact Limited reported a net income of 147.99M and revenue of 1.30B, resulting in a net margin of 11.4%.

FJTSY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fujitsu Ltd ADR reported a net income of 107.66B and revenue of 1.07T, resulting in a net margin of 10.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


G and FJTSY have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FJTSY has higher volatility (13.74%) compared to G (13.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, G dropped -64.14% vs FJTSY's -62.04%.

FJTSY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.15 vs -0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for G and FJTSY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer