PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FZILX vs. DCINX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FZILX vs. DCINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity ZERO International Index Fund (FZILX) and Dunham International Stock Fund (DCINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FZILX achieves a 16.29% return, which is significantly lower than DCINX's 26.35% return.


FZILX

1D
0.71%
1M
6.20%
YTD
16.29%
6M
19.11%
1Y
34.60%
3Y*
20.62%
5Y*
9.43%
10Y*

DCINX

1D
1.10%
1M
9.28%
YTD
26.35%
6M
30.17%
1Y
54.52%
3Y*
29.16%
5Y*
14.09%
10Y*
12.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FZILX vs. DCINX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FZILX
Fidelity ZERO International Index Fund
16.29%33.52%5.32%16.28%-15.96%8.19%11.06%21.69%-9.38%
DCINX
Dunham International Stock Fund
26.35%46.37%7.65%15.98%-14.67%9.70%19.86%18.14%-9.69%

Correlation

The correlation between FZILX and DCINX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2018

0.93

The correlation between FZILX and DCINX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FZILX vs. DCINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FZILX
FZILX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
FZILX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FZILX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
FZILX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
FZILX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
FZILX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

DCINX
DCINX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
DCINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DCINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
DCINX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
DCINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
DCINX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FZILX vs. DCINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity ZERO International Index Fund (FZILX) and Dunham International Stock Fund (DCINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FZILXDCINXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.61

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.04

4.61

-1.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.91

18.49

-6.58

FZILX vs. DCINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FZILX Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is lower than the DCINX Sharpe Ratio of 3.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FZILX and DCINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FZILXDCINXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.34

3.46

-1.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.92

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.35

+0.24

Drawdowns

FZILX vs. DCINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FZILX drawdown since its inception was -34.37%, smaller than the maximum DCINX drawdown of -61.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FZILX and DCINX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FZILXDCINXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.37%

-61.79%

+27.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.24%

-11.91%

+0.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.47%

-13.74%

+0.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.87%

-31.18%

+1.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.69%

-12.85%

+6.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.86%

2.96%

-0.10%

Volatility

FZILX vs. DCINX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity ZERO International Index Fund (FZILX) is 4.96%, while Dunham International Stock Fund (DCINX) has a volatility of 5.53%. This indicates that FZILX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DCINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FZILXDCINXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.96%

5.53%

-0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.26%

13.47%

-1.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.62%

15.89%

-1.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.52%

15.40%

+0.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.32%

16.53%

+0.79%

FZILX vs. DCINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FZILX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than DCINX's 2.92% expense ratio.


Dividends

FZILX vs. DCINX - Dividend Comparison

FZILX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.30%, less than DCINX's 8.66% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DCINX
Dunham International Stock Fund
8.66%10.95%13.87%3.45%3.53%15.49%1.36%1.54%6.92%3.92%
FZILX
Fidelity ZERO International Index Fund
2.30%2.67%3.00%2.98%2.71%2.61%1.64%2.37%0.02%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, FZILX and DCINX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DCINX has higher volatility (5.53%) compared to FZILX (4.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FZILX dropped -34.37% vs DCINX's -61.79%.

DCINX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.46 vs 2.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FZILX and DCINX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer